TRPA vs. IVEP

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

TRPA (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) and IVEP (Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRPA is a CLO fund actively managed by Hartford, while IVEP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure Index. TRPA is actively managed, while IVEP is passively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRPA charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IVEP.

Performance

TRPA vs. IVEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TRPA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 2.37%
• YTD: 2.45%
• 1Y: 4.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IVEP

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -8.37%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRPA vs. IVEP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TRPA Hartford AAA CLO ETF	1.53%
IVEP Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF	-2.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TRPA and IVEP is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026	0.06

Return for Risk

TRPA vs. IVEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRPA

TRPA Risk / Return Rank: 94
TRPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
TRPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
TRPA Omega Ratio Rank: 92
TRPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
TRPA Martin Ratio Rank: 97

IVEP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRPA vs. IVEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRPA	IVEP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.65	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.02	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	34.89	—	—

Drawdowns

TRPA vs. IVEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRPA drawdown since its inception was -0.61%, smaller than the maximum IVEP drawdown of -12.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRPA and IVEP.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRPA	IVEP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.61%	-12.46%	+11.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-12.46%	+12.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.09%	-4.03%	+3.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.14%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TRPA	IVEP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.26%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13%	28.91%	-26.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.27%	28.91%	-26.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.27%	28.91%	-26.64%

TRPA vs. IVEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRPA has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than IVEP's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRPA vs. IVEP - Dividend Comparison

TRPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, while IVEP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
IVEP Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF	0.00%	0.00%
TRPA Hartford AAA CLO ETF	5.15%	4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRPA and IVEP in my portfolio?

TRPA and IVEP have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TRPA or IVEP?

On fees, TRPA is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRPA or IVEP?

TRPA is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVEP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRPA or IVEP?

TRPA has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 0.00% for IVEP.

What is the main difference between TRPA and IVEP?

TRPA is categorized as CLO, while IVEP is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for TRPA and 0.75% for IVEP.