PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRPA vs. EVMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRPA vs. EVMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA) and Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF (EVMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRPA achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly higher than EVMO's 0.73% return.


TRPA

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.90%
6M
2.43%
1Y
5.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EVMO

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRPA vs. EVMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TRPA
Hartford AAA CLO ETF
1.90%1.96%
EVMO
Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF
0.73%3.33%

Correlation

The correlation between TRPA and EVMO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025

-0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRPA vs. EVMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRPA
TRPA Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TRPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRPA Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TRPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRPA Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

EVMO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRPA vs. EVMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA) and Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF (EVMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRPAEVMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

35.17

TRPA vs. EVMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRPAEVMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.55

1.76

+0.79

Drawdowns

TRPA vs. EVMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRPA drawdown since its inception was -0.61%, smaller than the maximum EVMO drawdown of -1.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRPA and EVMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRPAEVMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.61%

-1.89%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.91%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-0.38%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.15%

Volatility

TRPA vs. EVMO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRPAEVMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34%

2.83%

-0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.38%

2.83%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.38%

2.83%

-0.45%

TRPA vs. EVMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRPA has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than EVMO's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRPA vs. EVMO - Dividend Comparison

TRPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, more than EVMO's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025
EVMO
Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF
4.07%1.95%
TRPA
Hartford AAA CLO ETF
5.19%4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRPA and EVMO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRPA is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRPA is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EVMO.

TRPA has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 4.07% for EVMO.

TRPA is categorized as CLO, while EVMO is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for TRPA and 0.45% for EVMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRPA and EVMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer