TRP vs. REMX
TRP (TC Energy Corporation) is a stock, while REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Over the past 10 years, TRP returned 12.24%/yr vs 10.32%/yr for REMX. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRP vs. REMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRP achieves a 27.41% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 29.19% return. Over the past 10 years, TRP has outperformed REMX with an annualized return of 12.24%, while REMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.32% annualized return.
TRP
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 27.41%
- 6M
- 29.66%
- 1Y
- 46.49%
- 3Y*
- 30.95%
- 5Y*
- 14.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.24%
REMX
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 29.19%
- 6M
- 34.20%
- 1Y
- 145.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
TRP vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRP TC Energy Corporation | 27.41% | 24.02% | 39.88% | 6.09% | -7.83% | 20.99% | -19.09% | 56.30% | -22.64% | 13.51% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 29.19% | 92.95% | -35.02% | -19.18% | -31.13% | 79.81% | 64.82% | 0.74% | -49.63% | 82.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRP and REMX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2010 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TRP and REMX has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRP vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank
TRP
REMX
TRP vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TC Energy Corporation (TRP) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRP | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.40 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.70 | 6.23 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.42 | 16.82 | -2.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRP vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRP drawdown since its inception was -62.52%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRP and REMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRP | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.52% | -90.20% | +27.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.65% | -23.35% | +13.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.00% | -62.11% | +45.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.05% | -73.34% | +36.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.64% | -73.34% | +31.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -56.27% | +54.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.72% | -66.84% | +55.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 8.63% | -5.37% |
Volatility
TRP vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TC Energy Corporation (TRP) is 5.62%, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a volatility of 17.56%. This indicates that TRP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRP | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 17.56% | -11.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.27% | 37.14% | -23.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.71% | 49.74% | -32.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.86% | 40.64% | -18.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.83% | 37.14% | -12.31% |
Dividends
TRP vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison
TRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than REMX's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 1.36% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
TRP TC Energy Corporation | 3.58% | 4.45% | 5.93% | 7.73% | 8.52% | 5.94% | 5.92% | 4.25% | 5.85% | 5.14% | 5.01% | 6.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRP and REMX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REMX has higher volatility (17.56%) compared to TRP (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRP dropped -62.52% vs REMX's -90.20%.
REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRP and REMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer