TRMSX vs. TRLGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TRMSX (T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund) and TRLGX (T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - TRMSX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while TRLGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 5 years, TRMSX returned 7.59%/yr vs 12.88%/yr for TRLGX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRMSX charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TRLGX.

Performance

TRMSX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund (TRMSX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRMSX achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than TRLGX's 5.12% return.

TRMSX

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 6.18%
• YTD: 11.32%
• 6M: 10.24%
• 1Y: 23.53%
• 3Y*: 20.85%
• 5Y*: 7.59%
• 10Y*: —

TRLGX

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 5.03%
• YTD: 5.12%
• 6M: 4.79%
• 1Y: 20.79%
• 3Y*: 25.39%
• 5Y*: 12.88%
• 10Y*: 18.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRMSX vs. TRLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TRMSX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund	11.32%	12.61%	19.98%	29.90%	-28.56%	7.68%
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund	5.12%	17.51%	37.57%	46.22%	-35.26%	18.09%

Correlation

The correlation between TRMSX and TRLGX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2021	0.78

The correlation between TRMSX and TRLGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TRMSX vs. TRLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRMSX

TRMSX Risk / Return Rank: 43
TRMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
TRMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
TRMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
TRMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
TRMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

TRLGX

TRLGX Risk / Return Rank: 18
TRLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
TRLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
TRLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
TRLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
TRLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRMSX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund (TRMSX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRMSX	TRLGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.38	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	1.94	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.24	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	1.19	+1.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.62	3.75	+6.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRMSX vs. TRLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the TRLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRMSX and TRLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRMSX	TRLGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.72	1.38	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.58	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.58	-0.20

Drawdowns

TRMSX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRMSX drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, smaller than the maximum TRLGX drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMSX and TRLGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRMSX	TRLGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.34%	-55.56%	+18.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.51%	-18.18%	+8.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.02%	-21.17%	-4.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.34%	-40.44%	+3.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.90%	+0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.90%	-8.68%	-5.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	5.72%	-3.14%

Volatility

TRMSX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund (TRMSX) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) at 3.27%. This indicates that TRMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRMSX	TRLGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	3.27%	+1.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.97%	12.35%	+0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.84%	15.59%	+1.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.01%	22.38%	+0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.94%	21.76%	+1.18%

TRMSX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRMSX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRMSX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison

TRMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, less than TRLGX's 13.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund	13.02%	13.69%	9.80%	2.04%	3.88%	2.56%	0.42%	4.09%	7.93%	9.27%	1.64%	4.71%
TRMSX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund	5.83%	6.49%	1.98%	0.86%	1.92%	4.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRMSX and TRLGX in my portfolio?

TRMSX and TRLGX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRMSX or TRLGX?

TRMSX has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to TRLGX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRMSX dropped -37.34% vs TRLGX's -55.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.