PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRMSX vs. PKSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRMSX vs. PKSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund (TRMSX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRMSX achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than PKSFX's 3.17% return.


TRMSX

1D
1.07%
1M
6.18%
YTD
11.32%
6M
10.24%
1Y
23.53%
3Y*
20.85%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*

PKSFX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
3.17%
6M
3.35%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
10.77%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*
14.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRMSX vs. PKSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TRMSX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund
11.32%12.61%19.98%29.90%-28.56%7.68%
PKSFX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund
3.17%-2.58%13.67%32.32%-10.77%6.97%

Correlation

The correlation between TRMSX and PKSFX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2021

0.77

The correlation between TRMSX and PKSFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRMSX vs. PKSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRMSX
TRMSX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TRMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TRMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

PKSFX
PKSFX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
PKSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PKSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRMSX vs. PKSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund (TRMSX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRMSXPKSFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.06

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

0.41

+2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.62

0.87

+9.75

TRMSX vs. PKSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the PKSFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRMSX and PKSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRMSXPKSFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

0.30

+1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.43

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.56

-0.18

Drawdowns

TRMSX vs. PKSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRMSX drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, smaller than the maximum PKSFX drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMSX and PKSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRMSXPKSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.34%

-54.46%

+17.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-11.19%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.02%

-21.82%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.34%

-22.02%

-15.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.97%

+7.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.90%

-7.17%

-6.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

5.34%

-2.76%

Volatility

TRMSX vs. PKSFX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund (TRMSX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX) have volatilities of 4.33% and 4.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRMSXPKSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

4.22%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.97%

10.99%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.84%

15.31%

+1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.01%

17.93%

+5.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.94%

18.83%

+4.11%

TRMSX vs. PKSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRMSX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than PKSFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRMSX vs. PKSFX - Dividend Comparison

TRMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, less than PKSFX's 13.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PKSFX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund
13.86%14.30%4.07%4.12%6.65%12.05%7.45%4.03%4.33%0.17%5.69%19.83%
TRMSX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund
5.83%6.49%1.98%0.86%1.92%4.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRMSX and PKSFX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRMSX has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to PKSFX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRMSX dropped -37.34% vs PKSFX's -54.46%.

TRMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRMSX and PKSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer