TRMSX vs. BFGFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TRMSX (T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund) and BFGFX (Baron Focused Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TRMSX returned 7.59%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for BFGFX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRMSX charges 0.14%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for BFGFX.

Performance

TRMSX vs. BFGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund (TRMSX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRMSX achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than BFGFX's 1.84% return.

TRMSX

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 6.18%
• YTD: 11.32%
• 6M: 10.24%
• 1Y: 23.53%
• 3Y*: 20.85%
• 5Y*: 7.59%
• 10Y*: —

BFGFX

• 1D: -1.89%
• 1M: 6.00%
• YTD: 1.84%
• 6M: 12.90%
• 1Y: 21.99%
• 3Y*: 20.72%
• 5Y*: 12.80%
• 10Y*: 20.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRMSX vs. BFGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TRMSX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund	11.32%	12.61%	19.98%	29.90%	-28.56%	7.68%
BFGFX Baron Focused Growth Fund	1.84%	21.94%	29.52%	27.40%	-28.21%	28.57%

Correlation

The correlation between TRMSX and BFGFX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2021	0.82

The correlation between TRMSX and BFGFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TRMSX vs. BFGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRMSX

TRMSX Risk / Return Rank: 43
TRMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
TRMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
TRMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
TRMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
TRMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

BFGFX

BFGFX Risk / Return Rank: 26
BFGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
BFGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
BFGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BFGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BFGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRMSX vs. BFGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund (TRMSX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRMSX	BFGFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.19	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	2.18	+0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.25	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	2.32	+0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.62	6.26	+4.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRMSX vs. BFGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the BFGFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRMSX and BFGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRMSX	BFGFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.72	1.19	+0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.58	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.70	-0.32

Drawdowns

TRMSX vs. BFGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRMSX drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, smaller than the maximum BFGFX drawdown of -59.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMSX and BFGFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRMSX	BFGFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.34%	-59.52%	+22.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.51%	-9.74%	+0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.02%	-21.00%	-5.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.34%	-35.93%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.89%	+1.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.90%	-12.37%	-1.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	3.61%	-1.03%

Volatility

TRMSX vs. BFGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund (TRMSX) is 4.33%, while Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that TRMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRMSX	BFGFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	5.18%	-0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.97%	15.67%	-2.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.84%	19.05%	-2.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.01%	22.34%	+0.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.94%	23.99%	-1.05%

TRMSX vs. BFGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRMSX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than BFGFX's 1.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRMSX vs. BFGFX - Dividend Comparison

TRMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, while BFGFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BFGFX Baron Focused Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	12.28%	15.53%	2.85%	1.78%	1.07%	2.11%	6.02%	5.80%
TRMSX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund	5.83%	6.49%	1.98%	0.86%	1.92%	4.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRMSX and BFGFX in my portfolio?

TRMSX and BFGFX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRMSX or BFGFX?

BFGFX has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to TRMSX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRMSX dropped -37.34% vs BFGFX's -59.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.