TRMCX vs. PRWCX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX).
TRMCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 28, 1996. PRWCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 30, 1986.
Performance
TRMCX vs. PRWCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRMCX vs. PRWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRMCX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund | 3.51% | 10.55% | 16.21% | 18.99% | -4.16% | 24.51% | 9.84% | 19.59% | -10.66% | 11.59% |
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund | -3.22% | 20.92% | 12.50% | 18.85% | -12.00% | 18.45% | 18.13% | 24.62% | 0.63% | 15.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRMCX achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly higher than PRWCX's -3.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TRMCX having a 11.17% annualized return and PRWCX not far ahead at 11.41%.
TRMCX
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 17.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
PRWCX
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 16.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRMCX vs. PRWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRMCX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRMCX vs. PRWCX — Risk / Return Rank
TRMCX
PRWCX
TRMCX vs. PRWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRMCX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 1.27 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 2.37 | -0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.34 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 2.34 | -1.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | 9.70 | -5.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRMCX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.27 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.70 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.88 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.90 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRMCX and PRWCX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TRMCX vs. PRWCX - Dividend Comparison
TRMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.17%, less than PRWCX's 16.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRMCX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund | 9.17% | 9.49% | 14.20% | 7.65% | 13.92% | 9.22% | 3.79% | 4.25% | 12.13% | 6.58% | 6.74% | 11.39% |
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund | 16.24% | 15.72% | 10.38% | 4.15% | 9.44% | 9.23% | 7.97% | 5.83% | 7.46% | 6.82% | 3.51% | 9.86% |
Drawdowns
TRMCX vs. PRWCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRMCX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, which is greater than PRWCX's maximum drawdown of -41.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMCX and PRWCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRMCX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.28% | -41.77% | -13.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.82% | -6.80% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.60% | -17.07% | -12.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.41% | -26.86% | -12.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.98% | -4.47% | -2.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -3.34% | -3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 1.64% | +2.07% |
Volatility
TRMCX vs. PRWCX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) at 3.64%. This indicates that TRMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRMCX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 3.64% | +2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | 9.78% | +1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.85% | 13.57% | +6.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 13.24% | +6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 12.98% | +6.67% |