PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRLUX vs. YAFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRLUX vs. YAFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class (TRLUX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRLUX achieves a 17.30% return, which is significantly lower than YAFFX's 23.48% return.


TRLUX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.90%
YTD
17.30%
6M
16.96%
1Y
28.31%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
9.40%
10Y*

YAFFX

1D
-1.21%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
23.48%
6M
26.10%
1Y
19.98%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
12.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRLUX vs. YAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TRLUX
T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class
17.30%11.66%11.14%9.51%-5.25%21.12%36.65%
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
23.48%3.89%9.30%16.53%-8.20%16.48%39.00%

Correlation

The correlation between TRLUX and YAFFX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2020

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between TRLUX and YAFFX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRLUX vs. YAFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRLUX
TRLUX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
TRLUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRLUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRLUX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TRLUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRLUX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

YAFFX
YAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
YAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
YAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRLUX vs. YAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class (TRLUX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRLUXYAFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.24

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

1.14

+3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.82

4.02

+11.80

TRLUX vs. YAFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRLUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the YAFFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRLUX and YAFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRLUX vs. YAFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRLUX drawdown since its inception was -18.06%, smaller than the maximum YAFFX drawdown of -43.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRLUX and YAFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRLUXYAFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.06%

-43.80%

+25.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.02%

-17.08%

+10.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.59%

-18.88%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.06%

-21.31%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-6.02%

+5.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-6.21%

+2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

4.82%

-2.97%

Volatility

TRLUX vs. YAFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class (TRLUX) is 3.80%, while AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that TRLUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YAFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRLUXYAFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

7.15%

-3.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.67%

22.88%

-14.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

22.86%

-11.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.89%

18.24%

-3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.97%

16.61%

-0.64%

TRLUX vs. YAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRLUX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than YAFFX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRLUX vs. YAFFX - Dividend Comparison

TRLUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.86%, while YAFFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TRLUX
T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class
10.86%12.74%8.27%8.22%19.09%3.04%3.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
0.00%0.00%18.44%4.42%7.60%4.70%11.87%15.84%22.15%11.82%11.81%24.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRLUX and YAFFX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YAFFX has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to TRLUX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRLUX dropped -18.06% vs YAFFX's -43.80%.

TRLUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRLUX and YAFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer