PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRLUX vs. PRNHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRLUX vs. PRNHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class (TRLUX) and T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund (PRNHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TRLUX having a 15.07% return and PRNHX slightly lower at 15.06%.


TRLUX

1D
0.61%
1M
4.33%
YTD
15.07%
6M
17.11%
1Y
26.73%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*

PRNHX

1D
1.21%
1M
5.05%
YTD
15.06%
6M
12.99%
1Y
27.38%
3Y*
11.94%
5Y*
1.80%
10Y*
14.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRLUX vs. PRNHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TRLUX
T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class
15.07%11.66%11.14%9.51%-5.25%21.12%36.65%
PRNHX
T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund
15.06%3.27%8.80%21.35%-36.96%9.96%55.61%

Correlation

The correlation between TRLUX and PRNHX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2020

0.59

The correlation between TRLUX and PRNHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRLUX vs. PRNHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRLUX
TRLUX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
TRLUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRLUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRLUX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TRLUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRLUX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PRNHX
PRNHX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PRNHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRNHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRNHX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PRNHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRNHX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRLUX vs. PRNHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class (TRLUX) and T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund (PRNHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRLUXPRNHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.26

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

2.22

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.77

8.57

+6.21

TRLUX vs. PRNHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRLUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the PRNHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRLUX and PRNHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRLUXPRNHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

1.49

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.07

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.49

+0.51

Drawdowns

TRLUX vs. PRNHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRLUX drawdown since its inception was -18.06%, smaller than the maximum PRNHX drawdown of -70.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRLUX and PRNHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRLUXPRNHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.06%

-70.96%

+52.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.02%

-13.12%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.59%

-26.65%

+11.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.06%

-48.37%

+30.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-11.36%

+10.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-18.38%

+14.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

3.39%

-1.55%

Volatility

TRLUX vs. PRNHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class (TRLUX) is 3.29%, while T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund (PRNHX) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that TRLUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRNHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRLUXPRNHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

6.75%

-3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.25%

15.55%

-7.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.78%

19.51%

-8.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.89%

24.58%

-9.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.98%

22.83%

-6.85%

TRLUX vs. PRNHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRLUX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than PRNHX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRLUX vs. PRNHX - Dividend Comparison

TRLUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.07%, more than PRNHX's 10.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRNHX
T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund
10.30%11.85%9.82%0.00%4.72%17.09%13.67%23.46%13.94%8.27%5.77%7.72%
TRLUX
T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class
11.07%12.74%8.27%8.22%19.09%3.04%3.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRLUX and PRNHX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRNHX has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to TRLUX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRLUX dropped -18.06% vs PRNHX's -70.96%.

TRLUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRLUX and PRNHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer