PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRLIX vs. FSELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRLIX vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund (TRLIX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRLIX achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly lower than FSELX's 74.49% return. Over the past 10 years, TRLIX has underperformed FSELX with an annualized return of 11.07%, while FSELX has yielded a comparatively higher 38.36% annualized return.


TRLIX

1D
-0.42%
1M
1.04%
YTD
9.86%
6M
11.84%
1Y
24.94%
3Y*
18.25%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
11.07%

FSELX

1D
2.15%
1M
18.98%
YTD
74.49%
6M
75.66%
1Y
157.66%
3Y*
65.42%
5Y*
44.76%
10Y*
38.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRLIX vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRLIX
TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund
9.86%17.44%14.79%14.35%-7.03%27.10%3.59%28.83%-14.29%10.89%
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
74.49%52.17%49.68%78.49%-35.27%59.16%44.33%64.50%-12.01%34.51%

Correlation

The correlation between TRLIX and FSELX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002

0.69

The correlation between TRLIX and FSELX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRLIX vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRLIX
TRLIX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TRLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TRLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FSELX
FSELX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FSELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSELX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FSELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRLIX vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund (TRLIX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRLIXFSELXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.35

5.05

-2.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.33

4.99

-1.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.68

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

10.79

-7.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.27

41.52

-27.26

TRLIX vs. FSELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is lower than the FSELX Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRLIX and FSELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRLIXFSELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

5.05

-2.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

1.16

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

1.10

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.54

-0.05

Drawdowns

TRLIX vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRLIX drawdown since its inception was -61.94%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRLIX and FSELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRLIXFSELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.94%

-82.54%

+20.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-14.38%

+7.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.69%

-36.31%

+21.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.13%

-46.37%

+26.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.54%

-46.37%

+7.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

0.00%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-28.70%

+19.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

3.74%

-1.92%

Volatility

TRLIX vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund (TRLIX) is 2.97%, while Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a volatility of 10.80%. This indicates that TRLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRLIXFSELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

10.80%

-7.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.28%

24.78%

-16.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.83%

32.26%

-21.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.92%

38.87%

-23.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

35.01%

-16.96%

TRLIX vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRLIX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRLIX vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison

TRLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.03%, less than FSELX's 9.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
9.39%11.11%7.97%7.20%6.69%6.99%8.13%3.36%26.80%14.44%3.82%15.22%
TRLIX
TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund
8.03%8.82%4.01%8.58%6.13%9.19%1.89%2.08%12.82%5.19%4.29%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRLIX and FSELX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSELX has higher volatility (10.80%) compared to TRLIX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRLIX dropped -61.94% vs FSELX's -82.54%.

FSELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRLIX and FSELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer