PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRLGX vs. VTAPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRLGX vs. VTAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRLGX achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly higher than VTAPX's 2.05% return. Over the past 10 years, TRLGX has outperformed VTAPX with an annualized return of 18.44%, while VTAPX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.13% annualized return.


TRLGX

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.03%
YTD
5.12%
6M
4.79%
1Y
20.79%
3Y*
25.39%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
18.44%

VTAPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.04%
YTD
2.05%
6M
2.04%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
3.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRLGX vs. VTAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
5.12%17.51%37.57%46.22%-35.26%23.24%39.57%28.51%4.35%37.77%
VTAPX
Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares
2.05%6.03%4.73%4.59%-2.84%5.26%4.97%4.85%0.53%0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TRLGX and VTAPX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.04

The correlation between TRLGX and VTAPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRLGX vs. VTAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRLGX
TRLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TRLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TRLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

VTAPX
VTAPX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VTAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VTAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRLGX vs. VTAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRLGXVTAPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.65

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

6.45

-5.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.75

25.59

-21.84

TRLGX vs. VTAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRLGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the VTAPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRLGX and VTAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRLGXVTAPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

3.03

-1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

1.27

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

1.41

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.07

-0.49

Drawdowns

TRLGX vs. VTAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRLGX drawdown since its inception was -55.56%, which is greater than VTAPX's maximum drawdown of -5.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRLGX and VTAPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRLGXVTAPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.56%

-5.33%

-50.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.18%

-0.72%

-17.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.17%

-0.92%

-20.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.44%

-5.33%

-35.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.44%

-5.33%

-35.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-0.04%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.68%

-1.03%

-7.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.72%

0.18%

+5.54%

Volatility

TRLGX vs. VTAPX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTAPX) at 0.57%. This indicates that TRLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRLGXVTAPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

0.57%

+2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

1.11%

+11.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.59%

1.52%

+14.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.38%

2.67%

+19.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.76%

2.23%

+19.53%

TRLGX vs. VTAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRLGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VTAPX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRLGX vs. VTAPX - Dividend Comparison

TRLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.02%, more than VTAPX's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
13.02%13.69%9.80%2.04%3.88%2.56%0.42%4.09%7.93%9.27%1.64%4.71%
VTAPX
Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares
3.55%3.78%2.68%2.84%6.82%4.67%1.19%1.94%2.45%1.52%0.76%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRLGX and VTAPX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRLGX has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to VTAPX (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRLGX dropped -55.56% vs VTAPX's -5.33%.

VTAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRLGX and VTAPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer