PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRLAX vs. FDFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRLAX vs. FDFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Income 2020 Fund (TRLAX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRLAX achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than FDFPX's 14.11% return.


TRLAX

1D
0.31%
1M
2.56%
YTD
6.14%
6M
6.45%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*

FDFPX

1D
0.70%
1M
5.45%
YTD
14.11%
6M
15.71%
1Y
31.31%
3Y*
21.92%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRLAX vs. FDFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRLAX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Income 2020 Fund
6.14%10.92%8.74%12.89%-16.59%10.45%13.48%5.94%
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
14.11%22.81%17.81%20.93%-18.57%16.84%18.54%9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between TRLAX and FDFPX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.92

The correlation between TRLAX and FDFPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRLAX vs. FDFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRLAX
TRLAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TRLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
TRLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FDFPX
FDFPX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FDFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FDFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRLAX vs. FDFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Income 2020 Fund (TRLAX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRLAXFDFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.47

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.33

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.67

14.77

-0.09

TRLAX vs. FDFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRLAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the FDFPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRLAX and FDFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRLAXFDFPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.53

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.75

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.81

-0.11

Drawdowns

TRLAX vs. FDFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRLAX drawdown since its inception was -23.82%, smaller than the maximum FDFPX drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRLAX and FDFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRLAXFDFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.82%

-31.22%

+7.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.70%

-9.54%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.86%

-15.42%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.46%

-27.41%

+4.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-5.85%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

2.15%

-1.02%

Volatility

TRLAX vs. FDFPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement Income 2020 Fund (TRLAX) is 2.13%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that TRLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRLAXFDFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.13%

4.15%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.74%

10.33%

-4.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.10%

12.56%

-5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.81%

15.09%

-6.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.75%

17.18%

-7.43%

TRLAX vs. FDFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRLAX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFPX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRLAX vs. FDFPX - Dividend Comparison

TRLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.56%, more than FDFPX's 3.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
3.75%2.87%6.56%2.22%5.41%8.52%5.38%3.19%0.00%0.00%
TRLAX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Income 2020 Fund
8.56%8.08%8.38%6.52%7.29%7.77%7.93%5.80%7.83%2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRLAX and FDFPX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDFPX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to TRLAX (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRLAX dropped -23.82% vs FDFPX's -31.22%.

FDFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRLAX and FDFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer