PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRIS.L vs. VDST.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRIS.L vs. VDST.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRIS.L) and Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VDST.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TRIS.L is traded in GBp, while VDST.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VDST.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRIS.L achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than VDST.L's 1.87% return.


TRIS.L

1D
0.05%
1M
1.33%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.14%
1Y
4.90%
3Y*
2.01%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*

VDST.L

1D
0.04%
1M
1.23%
YTD
1.87%
6M
1.04%
1Y
4.96%
3Y*
2.08%
5Y*
4.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRIS.L vs. VDST.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TRIS.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist
1.60%-2.79%6.84%-0.75%12.57%1.25%-5.69%
VDST.L
Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
1.87%-3.17%7.08%-0.26%12.57%0.13%-5.17%

Correlation

The correlation between TRIS.L and VDST.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020

0.69

The correlation between TRIS.L and VDST.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.82 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRIS.L vs. VDST.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRIS.L
TRIS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TRIS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

VDST.L
VDST.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
VDST.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDST.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDST.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VDST.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDST.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRIS.L vs. VDST.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRIS.L) and Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VDST.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRIS.LVDST.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.13

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

0.96

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.75

2.61

+0.14

TRIS.L vs. VDST.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRIS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the VDST.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRIS.L and VDST.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRIS.LVDST.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

0.76

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.55

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.29

-0.03

Drawdowns

TRIS.L vs. VDST.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRIS.L drawdown since its inception was -18.99%, which is greater than VDST.L's maximum drawdown of -15.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIS.L and VDST.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRIS.LVDST.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.99%

-15.91%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.49%

-5.14%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.71%

-9.86%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.37%

-15.91%

+0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.66%

-6.10%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.81%

-7.99%

-1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

1.90%

-0.12%

Volatility

TRIS.L vs. VDST.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRIS.L) has a higher volatility of 2.02% compared to Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VDST.L) at 1.78%. This indicates that TRIS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDST.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRIS.LVDST.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

1.78%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.71%

4.93%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.45%

6.53%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.34%

8.87%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.80%

8.93%

-0.13%

TRIS.L vs. VDST.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRIS.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VDST.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRIS.L vs. VDST.L - Dividend Comparison

TRIS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, while VDST.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
TRIS.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist
4.01%4.26%4.87%4.68%1.52%0.10%0.57%
VDST.L
Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRIS.L and VDST.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDST.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDST.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for TRIS.L.

TRIS.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index, while VDST.L tracks Bloomberg Short Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TRIS.L and 0.05% for VDST.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRIS.L and VDST.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer