PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRIS.L vs. TSY3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRIS.L vs. TSY3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRIS.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TSY3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TRIS.L is traded in GBp, while TSY3.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TSY3.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRIS.L achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly higher than TSY3.L's 0.72% return.


TRIS.L

1D
0.05%
1M
1.33%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.14%
1Y
4.90%
3Y*
2.01%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*

TSY3.L

1D
0.10%
1M
1.10%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.32%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
1.49%
5Y*
2.87%
10Y*
2.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRIS.L vs. TSY3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TRIS.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist
1.60%-2.79%6.84%-0.75%12.57%1.25%-3.44%
TSY3.L
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
0.72%-2.00%5.79%-1.65%7.59%0.51%-1.64%

Correlation

The correlation between TRIS.L and TSY3.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2020

0.97

The correlation between TRIS.L and TSY3.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRIS.L vs. TSY3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRIS.L
TRIS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TRIS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

TSY3.L
TSY3.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TSY3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSY3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSY3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TSY3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSY3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRIS.L vs. TSY3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRIS.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TSY3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRIS.LTSY3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.13

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

0.98

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.75

2.50

+0.25

TRIS.L vs. TSY3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRIS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the TSY3.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRIS.L and TSY3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRIS.LTSY3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

0.72

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.35

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.31

-0.05

Drawdowns

TRIS.L vs. TSY3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRIS.L drawdown since its inception was -18.99%, roughly equal to the maximum TSY3.L drawdown of -18.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIS.L and TSY3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRIS.LTSY3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.99%

-18.75%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.49%

-4.50%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.71%

-8.92%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.37%

-16.38%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.66%

-7.69%

+2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.81%

-7.81%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

1.77%

+0.01%

Volatility

TRIS.L vs. TSY3.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRIS.L) has a higher volatility of 2.02% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TSY3.L) at 1.67%. This indicates that TRIS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSY3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRIS.LTSY3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

1.67%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.71%

4.50%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.45%

6.14%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.34%

8.21%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.80%

9.29%

-0.49%

TRIS.L vs. TSY3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRIS.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than TSY3.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRIS.L vs. TSY3.L - Dividend Comparison

TRIS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than TSY3.L's 3.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TRIS.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist
4.01%4.26%4.87%4.68%1.52%0.10%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSY3.L
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
3.92%4.25%4.07%3.02%0.60%0.56%1.84%2.14%1.31%1.04%0.63%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, TRIS.L and TSY3.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TSY3.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSY3.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for TRIS.L.

TRIS.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index, while TSY3.L tracks Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TRIS.L and 0.05% for TSY3.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRIS.L and TSY3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer