TRIGX vs. SCHF
Compare and contrast key facts about T.Rowe Price International Value Equity Fund (TRIGX) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF).
TRIGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 20, 1998. SCHF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009.
Performance
TRIGX vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRIGX vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIGX T.Rowe Price International Value Equity Fund | 2.14% | 43.90% | 7.85% | 19.18% | -8.45% | 12.77% | 1.63% | 20.89% | -18.22% | 18.34% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 4.58% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRIGX achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 4.58% return. Over the past 10 years, TRIGX has underperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 9.11%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively higher 9.59% annualized return.
TRIGX
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- -7.57%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 29.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.85%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
SCHF
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 31.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRIGX vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRIGX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRIGX vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
TRIGX
SCHF
TRIGX vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T.Rowe Price International Value Equity Fund (TRIGX) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRIGX | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.82 | 1.76 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 2.40 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 2.75 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.13 | 10.59 | -1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRIGX | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 1.76 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.56 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.56 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.40 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRIGX and SCHF is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TRIGX vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
TRIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than SCHF's 3.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIGX T.Rowe Price International Value Equity Fund | 2.72% | 2.78% | 2.58% | 2.66% | 2.98% | 2.49% | 1.34% | 2.82% | 2.49% | 0.26% | 2.65% | 2.07% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 3.27% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Drawdowns
TRIGX vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRIGX drawdown since its inception was -62.28%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIGX and SCHF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRIGX | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.28% | -34.87% | -27.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.16% | -11.48% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.37% | -29.14% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.94% | -34.87% | -7.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.43% | -7.16% | -2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.71% | -7.44% | -5.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 2.98% | +0.17% |
Volatility
TRIGX vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
T.Rowe Price International Value Equity Fund (TRIGX) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) have volatilities of 8.06% and 7.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRIGX | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.06% | 7.94% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.19% | 11.79% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.59% | 17.75% | -1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.70% | 16.14% | -0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 17.09% | -0.16% |