PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRGB.L vs. IBTU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRGB.L vs. IBTU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Dist (TRGB.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TRGB.L is traded in GBp, while IBTU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBTU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRGB.L achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly lower than IBTU.L's 1.35% return.


TRGB.L

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.22%
6M
-0.42%
YTD
-0.41%
1Y
2.50%
3Y*
2.22%
5Y*
-1.49%
10Y*

IBTU.L

1D
-1.04%
1M
-0.48%
6M
1.14%
YTD
1.35%
1Y
2.83%
3Y*
3.49%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRGB.L vs. IBTU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRGB.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Dist
-0.41%4.97%0.47%2.80%-13.39%-2.58%7.03%0.90%
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.35%-3.10%7.15%-0.33%13.06%1.04%-2.08%-3.50%

Correlation

The correlation between TRGB.L and IBTU.L is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

-0.12

The correlation between TRGB.L and IBTU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (3 years) to -0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRGB.L vs. IBTU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRGB.L
TRGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TRGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TRGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTU.L
IBTU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRGB.L vs. IBTU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Dist (TRGB.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRGB.LIBTU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.08

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

0.56

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.99

1.51

+0.49

TRGB.L vs. IBTU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRGB.L and IBTU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRGB.L vs. IBTU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRGB.L drawdown since its inception was -20.75%, which is greater than IBTU.L's maximum drawdown of -19.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRGB.L and IBTU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRGB.LIBTU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.75%

-19.03%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-5.03%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.22%

-9.76%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.24%

-15.83%

-2.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.85%

-6.44%

-4.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.81%

-9.18%

-0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

1.87%

-0.62%

Volatility

TRGB.L vs. IBTU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Dist (TRGB.L) is 0.95%, while iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L) has a volatility of 2.18%. This indicates that TRGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBTU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRGB.LIBTU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

2.18%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.56%

5.17%

-2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

6.70%

-3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.64%

8.47%

-2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.41%

8.72%

-3.31%

TRGB.L vs. IBTU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRGB.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTU.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRGB.L vs. IBTU.L - Dividend Comparison

TRGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than IBTU.L's 4.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.05%4.43%6.82%3.99%0.44%0.10%1.28%1.21%
TRGB.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Dist
3.19%3.05%4.21%3.73%1.95%1.10%1.53%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRGB.L and IBTU.L have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBTU.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTU.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for TRGB.L.

TRGB.L tracks Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Dist, while IBTU.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TRGB.L and 0.07% for IBTU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRGB.L and IBTU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer