TRFM vs. TSXU
TRFM (AAM Transformers ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - TRFM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pence Transformers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRFM charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
TRFM vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRFM achieves a 26.90% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 112.57% return.
TRFM
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 20.00%
- YTD
- 26.90%
- 1Y
- 40.89%
- 3Y*
- 26.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- 4.77%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 88.72%
- YTD
- 112.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRFM vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRFM AAM Transformers ETF | 26.90% | -1.45% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 112.57% | 37.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRFM and TSXU is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRFM vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
TRFM
TSXU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TRFM vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRFM | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.05 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRFM vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRFM drawdown since its inception was -28.40%, smaller than the maximum TSXU drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFM and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRFM | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.40% | -35.62% | +7.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.27% | -14.06% | +9.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.54% | -10.89% | +4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | — | — |
Volatility
TRFM vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRFM | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.90% | 90.34% | -65.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.27% | 90.34% | -63.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.27% | 90.34% | -63.07% |
TRFM vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRFM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRFM vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
TRFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than TSXU's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
TRFM AAM Transformers ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.65% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRFM and TSXU have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRFM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRFM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.13% for TRFM.
TRFM is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. TRFM tracks Pence Transformers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TSXU tracks Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). They also come from different issuers: AAM and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TRFM and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for TRFM and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer