TRFM vs. TECL
TRFM (AAM Transformers ETF) and TECL (Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - TRFM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pence Transformers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TECL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Technology Select Sector Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TRFM returned 31.42%/yr vs 78.93%/yr for TECL. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRFM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for TECL.
Performance
TRFM vs. TECL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRFM achieves a 29.81% return, which is significantly lower than TECL's 115.57% return.
TRFM
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 10.30%
- YTD
- 29.81%
- 6M
- 27.54%
- 1Y
- 52.18%
- 3Y*
- 31.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TECL
- 1D
- -4.56%
- 1M
- 55.10%
- YTD
- 115.57%
- 6M
- 106.65%
- 1Y
- 249.35%
- 3Y*
- 78.93%
- 5Y*
- 42.11%
- 10Y*
- 53.62%
TRFM vs. TECL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRFM AAM Transformers ETF | 29.81% | 25.76% | 19.96% | 44.71% | -7.38% |
TECL Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares | 115.57% | 38.60% | 36.15% | 203.14% | -24.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRFM and TECL is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between TRFM and TECL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
TRFM vs. TECL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TRFM
TECL
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Energy
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
TRFM
TECL
Consumer Cyclical
TRFM
TECL
-
Communication Services
TRFM
TECL
-
Industrials
TRFM
TECL
Energy
TRFM
TECL
Financial Services
TRFM
TECL
-
Utilities
TRFM
TECL
-
Basic Materials
TRFM
TECL
-
Healthcare
TRFM
TECL
-
Consumer Defensive
TRFM
-
TECL
-
Real Estate
TRFM
-
TECL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRFM vs. TECL — Risk / Return Rank
TRFM
TECL
TRFM vs. TECL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRFM | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.46 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.04 | 5.39 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.69 | 15.48 | -1.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRFM | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 4.03 | -1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.76 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
TRFM vs. TECL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRFM drawdown since its inception was -28.40%, smaller than the maximum TECL drawdown of -77.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFM and TECL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRFM | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.40% | -77.96% | +49.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.99% | -46.58% | +33.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.40% | -66.58% | +38.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -77.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -77.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -7.42% | +5.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -18.38% | +11.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 16.19% | -12.37% |
Volatility
TRFM vs. TECL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) is 7.33%, while Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) has a volatility of 21.53%. This indicates that TRFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TECL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRFM | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 21.53% | -14.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.46% | 50.05% | -32.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.44% | 62.27% | -39.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.92% | 74.08% | -47.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.92% | 72.35% | -45.43% |
TRFM vs. TECL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRFM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TECL's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRFM vs. TECL - Dividend Comparison
TRFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than TECL's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TECL Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares | 3.30% | 7.19% | 0.29% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.32% | 0.52% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 0.10% |
TRFM AAM Transformers ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRFM and TECL have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TECL has higher volatility (21.53%) compared to TRFM (7.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRFM dropped -28.40% vs TECL's -77.96%.
On 3-year performance, TECL leads with 78.93% vs 31.42% for TRFM. On fees, TRFM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, TRFM has been the lower-risk option at 7.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TECL has performed better with a 78.93% return vs 31.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TRFM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for TECL.
TECL has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 0.13% for TRFM.
TRFM is categorized as Technology Equities, while TECL is Leveraged Equities. TRFM tracks Pence Transformers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TECL tracks Technology Select Sector Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: AAM and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TRFM and 0.91% for TECL.
TECL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.03 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRFM and TECL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer