TRFM vs. FTXL
TRFM (AAM Transformers ETF) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRFM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pence Transformers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TRFM returned 31.63%/yr vs 61.52%/yr for FTXL. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRFM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
TRFM vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRFM achieves a 30.30% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.
TRFM
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 12.40%
- YTD
- 30.30%
- 6M
- 29.25%
- 1Y
- 53.69%
- 3Y*
- 31.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXL
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- 30.59%
- YTD
- 115.70%
- 6M
- 113.17%
- 1Y
- 225.15%
- 3Y*
- 61.52%
- 5Y*
- 34.63%
- 10Y*
- —
TRFM vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRFM AAM Transformers ETF | 30.30% | 25.76% | 19.96% | 44.71% | -7.38% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 115.70% | 48.94% | 7.59% | 54.41% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRFM and FTXL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022 | 0.82 |
The correlation between TRFM and FTXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
TRFM vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TRFM
FTXL
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
TRFM
FTXL
Consumer Cyclical
TRFM
FTXL
-
Communication Services
TRFM
FTXL
-
Industrials
TRFM
FTXL
Energy
TRFM
FTXL
-
Financial Services
TRFM
FTXL
-
Utilities
TRFM
FTXL
-
Basic Materials
TRFM
FTXL
-
Healthcare
TRFM
FTXL
-
Consumer Defensive
TRFM
-
FTXL
-
Real Estate
TRFM
-
FTXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRFM vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
TRFM
FTXL
TRFM vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRFM | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.41 | 6.33 | -3.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.04 | 5.74 | -2.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.78 | -0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.15 | 15.62 | -11.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.09 | 58.28 | -44.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRFM | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 6.33 | -3.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.94 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
TRFM vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRFM drawdown since its inception was -28.40%, smaller than the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFM and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRFM | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.40% | -43.87% | +15.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.99% | -14.51% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.40% | -41.57% | +13.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | 0.00% | -1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -10.56% | +3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 3.88% | -0.06% |
Volatility
TRFM vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) is 7.34%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that TRFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRFM | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.34% | 14.28% | -6.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.46% | 28.98% | -11.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.47% | 35.94% | -13.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 36.02% | -9.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 34.25% | -7.31% |
TRFM vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRFM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRFM vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
TRFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, more than FTXL's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.12% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
TRFM AAM Transformers ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRFM and FTXL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to TRFM (7.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRFM dropped -28.40% vs FTXL's -43.87%.
On 3-year performance, FTXL leads with 61.52% vs 31.63% for TRFM. On fees, TRFM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, TRFM has been the lower-risk option at 7.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 61.52% return vs 31.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TRFM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXL.
TRFM has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.12% for FTXL.
TRFM is categorized as Technology Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. TRFM tracks Pence Transformers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: AAM and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TRFM and 0.60% for FTXL.
FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRFM and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer