PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRERX vs. SFNNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRERX vs. SFNNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen International Equity Fund Retirement Class (TRERX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRERX achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly lower than SFNNX's 21.09% return. Over the past 10 years, TRERX has underperformed SFNNX with an annualized return of 8.10%, while SFNNX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.


TRERX

1D
-0.84%
1M
2.38%
YTD
6.47%
6M
8.17%
1Y
22.48%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*
8.10%

SFNNX

1D
-0.36%
1M
5.59%
YTD
21.09%
6M
24.53%
1Y
44.46%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRERX vs. SFNNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRERX
Nuveen International Equity Fund Retirement Class
6.47%32.87%3.71%16.63%-17.52%10.54%15.51%22.95%-23.69%31.53%
SFNNX
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund
21.09%41.06%2.27%19.88%-7.95%14.38%4.35%18.09%-13.96%23.95%

Correlation

The correlation between TRERX and SFNNX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.93

The correlation between TRERX and SFNNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRERX vs. SFNNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRERX
TRERX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TRERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRERX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TRERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRERX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

SFNNX
SFNNX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SFNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SFNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRERX vs. SFNNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen International Equity Fund Retirement Class (TRERX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRERXSFNNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.57

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

4.25

-2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.05

15.95

-9.90

TRERX vs. SFNNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRERX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the SFNNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRERX and SFNNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRERXSFNNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

3.15

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.86

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.69

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.28

+0.09

Drawdowns

TRERX vs. SFNNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRERX drawdown since its inception was -64.73%, which is greater than SFNNX's maximum drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRERX and SFNNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRERXSFNNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.73%

-59.60%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.26%

-10.63%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.69%

-13.78%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.21%

-25.66%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.32%

-40.23%

-2.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

-0.36%

-2.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.47%

-11.97%

-2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

2.82%

+0.99%

Volatility

TRERX vs. SFNNX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen International Equity Fund Retirement Class (TRERX) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) at 4.62%. This indicates that TRERX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFNNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRERXSFNNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

4.62%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.18%

11.58%

+2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.14%

14.34%

+2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

15.56%

+1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

17.29%

+0.82%

TRERX vs. SFNNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRERX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SFNNX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRERX vs. SFNNX - Dividend Comparison

TRERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.22%, more than SFNNX's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFNNX
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund
4.22%5.11%3.61%3.26%2.92%3.81%2.42%3.69%3.51%2.70%3.21%2.92%
TRERX
Nuveen International Equity Fund Retirement Class
10.22%10.88%2.17%2.28%1.85%2.47%0.93%1.39%7.06%1.25%1.20%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, TRERX and SFNNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TRERX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to SFNNX (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRERX dropped -64.73% vs SFNNX's -59.60%.

SFNNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRERX and SFNNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer