PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRERX vs. NHMRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRERX vs. NHMRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen International Equity Fund Retirement Class (TRERX) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NHMRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRERX achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly higher than NHMRX's 3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, TRERX has outperformed NHMRX with an annualized return of 8.10%, while NHMRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.74% annualized return.


TRERX

1D
-0.84%
1M
2.38%
YTD
6.47%
6M
8.17%
1Y
22.48%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*
8.10%

NHMRX

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.25%
YTD
3.11%
6M
3.87%
1Y
9.59%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
1.19%
10Y*
3.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRERX vs. NHMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRERX
Nuveen International Equity Fund Retirement Class
6.47%32.87%3.71%16.63%-17.52%10.54%15.51%22.95%-23.69%31.53%
NHMRX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
3.11%3.24%5.62%7.31%-14.96%9.93%3.25%12.59%2.06%12.10%

Correlation

The correlation between TRERX and NHMRX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2002

0.01

Over the past year, TRERX and NHMRX have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRERX vs. NHMRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRERX
TRERX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TRERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRERX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TRERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRERX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

NHMRX
NHMRX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NHMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NHMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRERX vs. NHMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen International Equity Fund Retirement Class (TRERX) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NHMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRERXNHMRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.52

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

2.83

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.05

8.57

-2.52

TRERX vs. NHMRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRERX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the NHMRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRERX and NHMRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRERXNHMRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

2.27

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.17

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.56

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.89

-0.52

Drawdowns

TRERX vs. NHMRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRERX drawdown since its inception was -64.73%, which is greater than NHMRX's maximum drawdown of -45.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRERX and NHMRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRERXNHMRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.73%

-45.45%

-19.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.26%

-3.58%

-9.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.69%

-10.49%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.21%

-21.52%

-10.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.32%

-22.22%

-20.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

-0.07%

-3.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.47%

-5.32%

-9.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

1.18%

+2.63%

Volatility

TRERX vs. NHMRX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen International Equity Fund Retirement Class (TRERX) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NHMRX) at 1.58%. This indicates that TRERX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NHMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRERXNHMRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

1.58%

+3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.18%

3.13%

+11.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.14%

4.48%

+12.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

6.85%

+10.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

6.73%

+11.38%

TRERX vs. NHMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRERX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than NHMRX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRERX vs. NHMRX - Dividend Comparison

TRERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.22%, more than NHMRX's 6.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NHMRX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
6.09%6.54%5.79%7.34%5.64%4.69%5.03%5.39%5.47%5.38%5.88%5.60%
TRERX
Nuveen International Equity Fund Retirement Class
10.22%10.88%2.17%2.28%1.85%2.47%0.93%1.39%7.06%1.25%1.20%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRERX and NHMRX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRERX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to NHMRX (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRERX dropped -64.73% vs NHMRX's -45.45%.

NHMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRERX and NHMRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer