PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRE.L vs. QCLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRE.L vs. QCLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRE.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TRE.L is traded in USD, while QCLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the QCLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRE.L achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN.L's 22.20% return.


TRE.L

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.32%
6M
6.26%
YTD
7.87%
1Y
10.69%
3Y*
2.81%
5Y*
10Y*

QCLN.L

1D
-0.71%
1M
-12.89%
6M
11.93%
YTD
22.20%
1Y
59.10%
3Y*
-0.05%
5Y*
-2.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRE.L vs. QCLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TRE.L
First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF
7.87%7.74%-10.98%13.15%-25.64%
QCLN.L
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc
22.20%29.15%-19.30%-8.05%-28.44%

Correlation

The correlation between TRE.L and QCLN.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2022

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between TRE.L and QCLN.L has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRE.L vs. QCLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRE.L
TRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
TRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN.L
QCLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
QCLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRE.L vs. QCLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRE.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRE.LQCLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.24

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

2.70

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.74

8.72

-4.99

TRE.L vs. QCLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the QCLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRE.L and QCLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRE.L vs. QCLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRE.L drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum QCLN.L drawdown of -72.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRE.L and QCLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRE.LQCLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.43%

-72.06%

+36.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-21.81%

+12.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

-57.08%

+35.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.28%

-37.69%

+23.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.59%

-30.42%

+8.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

6.75%

-3.70%

Volatility

TRE.L vs. QCLN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRE.L) is 4.97%, while First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.L) has a volatility of 16.84%. This indicates that TRE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRE.LQCLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

16.84%

-11.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.13%

30.94%

-19.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.98%

39.14%

-25.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.60%

40.29%

-21.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

2,355.90%

-2,337.30%

Dividends

TRE.L vs. QCLN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither TRE.L nor QCLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TRE.L and QCLN.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRE.L is categorized as REIT, while QCLN.L is Energy Equities. TRE.L tracks First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF, while QCLN.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRE.L and QCLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer