PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRDS.DE vs. QDVP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRDS.DE vs. QDVP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRDS.DE) and iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF (QDVP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRDS.DE achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than QDVP.DE's 1.51% return.


TRDS.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.72%
YTD
0.86%
6M
0.02%
1Y
1.02%
3Y*
-0.30%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*

QDVP.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.87%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.20%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
1.34%
5Y*
1.05%
10Y*
0.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRDS.DE vs. QDVP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRDS.DE
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
0.86%-5.91%6.16%0.07%-6.97%5.67%-2.04%6.04%
QDVP.DE
iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF
1.51%-3.56%7.02%0.27%-6.06%6.72%-5.61%5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between TRDS.DE and QDVP.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2019

0.87

The correlation between TRDS.DE and QDVP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRDS.DE vs. QDVP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRDS.DE
TRDS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TRDS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRDS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRDS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
TRDS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRDS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVP.DE
QDVP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
QDVP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRDS.DE vs. QDVP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRDS.DE) and iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF (QDVP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRDS.DEQDVP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.14

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

1.23

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.60

3.10

-2.50

TRDS.DE vs. QDVP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRDS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the QDVP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRDS.DE and QDVP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRDS.DEQDVP.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

0.75

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.13

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.09

-0.04

Drawdowns

TRDS.DE vs. QDVP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRDS.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.77%, which is greater than QDVP.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRDS.DE and QDVP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRDS.DEQDVP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.77%

-16.57%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.13%

-3.46%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.21%

-11.15%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.10%

-14.91%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.15%

-7.63%

-6.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.46%

-7.72%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

1.37%

+0.31%

Volatility

TRDS.DE vs. QDVP.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRDS.DE) and iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF (QDVP.DE) have volatilities of 0.93% and 0.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRDS.DEQDVP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

0.92%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.90%

4.07%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.61%

5.62%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.04%

8.15%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.80%

7.56%

+0.24%

TRDS.DE vs. QDVP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRDS.DE has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVP.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRDS.DE vs. QDVP.DE - Dividend Comparison

TRDS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than QDVP.DE's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QDVP.DE
iShares US Mortgage Backed Securities UCITS ETF
3.58%3.63%3.51%3.27%2.45%2.19%2.69%2.99%3.03%3.04%1.54%
TRDS.DE
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
3.65%3.76%3.83%3.58%1.90%0.94%1.47%1.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, TRDS.DE and QDVP.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TRDS.DE is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRDS.DE is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QDVP.DE.

TRDS.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while QDVP.DE is Mortgage Backed Securities. TRDS.DE tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index, while QDVP.DE tracks Bloomberg US Mortgage Backed Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TRDS.DE and 0.28% for QDVP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRDS.DE and QDVP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer