PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRDS.DE vs. PR1S.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRDS.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRDS.DE) and Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1S.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRDS.DE achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than PR1S.DE's 1.04% return.


TRDS.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.72%
YTD
0.86%
6M
0.02%
1Y
1.02%
3Y*
-0.30%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*

PR1S.DE

1D
0.07%
1M
0.83%
YTD
1.04%
6M
0.32%
1Y
1.64%
3Y*
0.10%
5Y*
0.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRDS.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRDS.DE
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
0.86%-5.91%6.16%0.07%-6.97%5.67%-2.04%6.04%
PR1S.DE
Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D)
1.04%-5.53%6.59%0.45%-6.79%5.94%-1.86%-5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TRDS.DE and PR1S.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2019

0.91

The correlation between TRDS.DE and PR1S.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRDS.DE vs. PR1S.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRDS.DE
TRDS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TRDS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRDS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRDS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
TRDS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRDS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

PR1S.DE
PR1S.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PR1S.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1S.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1S.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1S.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1S.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRDS.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRDS.DE) and Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1S.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRDS.DEPR1S.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.05

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

0.40

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.60

1.01

-0.41

TRDS.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRDS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the PR1S.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRDS.DE and PR1S.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRDS.DEPR1S.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

0.30

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.07

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

-0.09

+0.14

Drawdowns

TRDS.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRDS.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.77%, roughly equal to the maximum PR1S.DE drawdown of -17.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRDS.DE and PR1S.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRDS.DEPR1S.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.77%

-17.15%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.13%

-4.05%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.21%

-11.04%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.10%

-12.84%

-0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.15%

-12.54%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.46%

-10.33%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

1.62%

+0.06%

Volatility

TRDS.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRDS.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.93% compared to Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1S.DE) at 0.86%. This indicates that TRDS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1S.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRDS.DEPR1S.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

0.86%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.90%

3.80%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.61%

5.49%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.04%

8.02%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.80%

8.93%

-1.13%

TRDS.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRDS.DE has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1S.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRDS.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Dividend Comparison

TRDS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than PR1S.DE's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PR1S.DE
Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D)
3.19%3.22%2.83%2.36%1.91%1.73%2.14%1.50%
TRDS.DE
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
3.65%3.76%3.83%3.58%1.90%0.94%1.47%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, TRDS.DE and PR1S.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PR1S.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1S.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for TRDS.DE.

TRDS.DE tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index, while PR1S.DE tracks Solactive US Treasury Bond. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TRDS.DE and 0.05% for PR1S.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRDS.DE and PR1S.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer