TRDFX vs. WEMMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund (TRDFX) and TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX).
TRDFX is managed by Crossmark Steward Funds. It was launched on Jan 31, 1952. WEMMX is managed by Teton Westwood. It was launched on May 11, 1998.
Performance
TRDFX vs. WEMMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRDFX vs. WEMMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRDFX Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund | -0.08% | 5.76% | 9.90% | 15.86% | -14.98% | 26.35% | 10.40% | 21.40% | -12.76% | 13.92% |
WEMMX TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund | 4.76% | 11.02% | 3.83% | 13.53% | -15.37% | 21.44% | 10.02% | 16.94% | -13.69% | 15.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRDFX achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than WEMMX's 4.76% return. Over the past 10 years, TRDFX has outperformed WEMMX with an annualized return of 8.63%, while WEMMX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.17% annualized return.
TRDFX
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -7.50%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 14.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.20%
- 5Y*
- 4.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
WEMMX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -7.13%
- YTD
- 4.76%
- 6M
- 4.86%
- 1Y
- 24.54%
- 3Y*
- 9.77%
- 5Y*
- 4.35%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRDFX vs. WEMMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRDFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than WEMMX's 1.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRDFX vs. WEMMX — Risk / Return Rank
TRDFX
WEMMX
TRDFX vs. WEMMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund (TRDFX) and TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRDFX | WEMMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 1.21 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 1.80 | -0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.22 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 1.90 | -1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.79 | 6.03 | -2.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRDFX | WEMMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 1.21 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.23 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.40 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.61 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRDFX and WEMMX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TRDFX vs. WEMMX - Dividend Comparison
TRDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.77%, less than WEMMX's 21.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRDFX Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund | 8.77% | 8.76% | 6.18% | 4.29% | 28.61% | 13.92% | 4.16% | 3.50% | 15.78% | 7.77% | 3.51% | 13.93% |
WEMMX TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund | 21.77% | 22.80% | 26.79% | 18.86% | 13.60% | 15.44% | 9.23% | 4.11% | 4.16% | 6.44% | 4.61% | 2.35% |
Drawdowns
TRDFX vs. WEMMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRDFX drawdown since its inception was -61.60%, which is greater than WEMMX's maximum drawdown of -42.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRDFX and WEMMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRDFX | WEMMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.60% | -42.48% | -19.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.44% | -11.39% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.52% | -27.11% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.92% | -41.73% | -4.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.48% | -8.04% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -6.65% | -6.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 3.60% | -0.24% |
Volatility
TRDFX vs. WEMMX - Volatility Comparison
Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund (TRDFX) and TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX) have volatilities of 5.63% and 5.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRDFX | WEMMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 5.84% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.69% | 12.24% | -0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.26% | 20.00% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 18.87% | +3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.84% | 20.36% | +2.48% |