TRDFX vs. SSLCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund (TRDFX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX).
TRDFX is managed by Crossmark Steward Funds. It was launched on Jan 31, 1952. SSLCX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jul 14, 2000.
Performance
TRDFX vs. SSLCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRDFX vs. SSLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRDFX Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund | -0.08% | 5.76% | 9.90% | 15.86% | -14.98% | 26.35% | 10.40% | 21.40% | -12.76% | 13.92% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 0.38% | 4.99% | 9.85% | 13.09% | -13.53% | 41.16% | 14.65% | 21.72% | -14.28% | 11.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRDFX achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than SSLCX's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, TRDFX has underperformed SSLCX with an annualized return of 8.63%, while SSLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.91% annualized return.
TRDFX
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -7.50%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 14.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.20%
- 5Y*
- 4.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
SSLCX
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- 8.58%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRDFX vs. SSLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRDFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than SSLCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRDFX vs. SSLCX — Risk / Return Rank
TRDFX
SSLCX
TRDFX vs. SSLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund (TRDFX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRDFX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 0.50 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 0.81 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.11 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 0.62 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.79 | 2.03 | +1.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRDFX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.50 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.32 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.47 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.37 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRDFX and SSLCX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TRDFX vs. SSLCX - Dividend Comparison
TRDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.77%, more than SSLCX's 1.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRDFX Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund | 8.77% | 8.76% | 6.18% | 4.29% | 28.61% | 13.92% | 4.16% | 3.50% | 15.78% | 7.77% | 3.51% | 13.93% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.52% | 0.68% | 1.07% | 1.67% | 0.35% | 0.16% | 5.99% | 5.78% | 0.60% | 8.42% |
Drawdowns
TRDFX vs. SSLCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRDFX drawdown since its inception was -61.60%, roughly equal to the maximum SSLCX drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRDFX and SSLCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRDFX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.60% | -63.14% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.44% | -10.06% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.52% | -22.57% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.92% | -48.07% | +2.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.48% | -5.55% | -2.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -11.38% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 3.09% | +0.27% |
Volatility
TRDFX vs. SSLCX - Volatility Comparison
Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund (TRDFX) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) at 4.67%. This indicates that TRDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRDFX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 4.67% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.69% | 11.01% | +0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.26% | 17.54% | +3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 17.64% | +4.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.84% | 21.06% | +1.78% |