PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRDFX vs. DFISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRDFX vs. DFISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund (TRDFX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRDFX achieves a 14.21% return, which is significantly higher than DFISX's 9.65% return. Over the past 10 years, TRDFX has outperformed DFISX with an annualized return of 9.78%, while DFISX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.36% annualized return.


TRDFX

1D
0.95%
1M
3.21%
YTD
14.21%
6M
14.01%
1Y
26.70%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
9.78%

DFISX

1D
0.18%
1M
3.43%
YTD
9.65%
6M
13.12%
1Y
26.38%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
8.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRDFX vs. DFISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRDFX
Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund
14.21%5.76%9.90%15.86%-14.98%26.35%10.40%21.40%-12.76%13.92%
DFISX
DFA International Small Company Portfolio
9.65%36.35%3.76%14.46%-17.13%10.71%9.27%24.18%-19.42%24.78%

Correlation

The correlation between TRDFX and DFISX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 1996

0.55

The correlation between TRDFX and DFISX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRDFX vs. DFISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRDFX
TRDFX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TRDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TRDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

DFISX
DFISX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DFISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFISX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DFISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFISX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRDFX vs. DFISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund (TRDFX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRDFXDFISXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.80

1.87

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.61

2.65

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

2.15

+1.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.62

7.90

+3.71

TRDFX vs. DFISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRDFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the DFISX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRDFX and DFISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRDFXDFISXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.87

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.46

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.52

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.47

-0.11

Drawdowns

TRDFX vs. DFISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRDFX drawdown since its inception was -61.60%, roughly equal to the maximum DFISX drawdown of -60.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRDFX and DFISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRDFXDFISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.60%

-60.66%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-11.96%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.32%

-13.68%

-12.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.52%

-35.06%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.92%

-43.00%

-2.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.31%

+1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.97%

-11.64%

-1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

3.24%

-0.79%

Volatility

TRDFX vs. DFISX - Volatility Comparison

Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund (TRDFX) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) at 3.78%. This indicates that TRDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRDFXDFISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

3.78%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.23%

11.00%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

13.77%

+2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.00%

15.89%

+6.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.86%

16.20%

+6.66%

TRDFX vs. DFISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRDFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DFISX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRDFX vs. DFISX - Dividend Comparison

TRDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.67%, more than DFISX's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFISX
DFA International Small Company Portfolio
2.87%3.19%3.39%3.01%3.51%3.06%1.71%4.54%7.74%1.27%4.44%4.47%
TRDFX
Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund
7.67%8.76%6.18%4.29%28.61%13.92%4.16%3.50%15.78%7.77%3.51%13.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRDFX and DFISX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRDFX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to DFISX (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRDFX dropped -61.60% vs DFISX's -60.66%.

DFISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRDFX and DFISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer