PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRD1.DE vs. 0NS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRD1.DE vs. 0NS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD Dist (TRD1.DE) and Amundi US Treasury Bond 0-1Y UCITS ETF SGD Hedged (Acc) (0NS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TRD1.DE is traded in EUR, while 0NS.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 0NS.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRD1.DE achieves a 4.62% return, which is significantly higher than 0NS.DE's 2.57% return.


TRD1.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.46%
6M
2.92%
YTD
4.62%
1Y
5.14%
3Y*
3.93%
5Y*
3.97%
10Y*

0NS.DE

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.03%
6M
1.68%
YTD
2.57%
1Y
2.08%
3Y*
2.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRD1.DE vs. 0NS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TRD1.DE
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD Dist
4.62%-7.35%11.23%1.38%1.92%
0NS.DE
Amundi US Treasury Bond 0-1Y UCITS ETF SGD Hedged (Acc)
2.57%-4.75%6.80%1.82%-24.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TRD1.DE and 0NS.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2022

0.42

The correlation between TRD1.DE and 0NS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRD1.DE vs. 0NS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRD1.DE
TRD1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TRD1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRD1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRD1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TRD1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRD1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

0NS.DE
0NS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
0NS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0NS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
0NS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
0NS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
0NS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRD1.DE vs. 0NS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD Dist (TRD1.DE) and Amundi US Treasury Bond 0-1Y UCITS ETF SGD Hedged (Acc) (0NS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRD1.DE0NS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.08

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

0.84

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.62

1.48

+2.14

TRD1.DE vs. 0NS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRD1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the 0NS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRD1.DE and 0NS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRD1.DE vs. 0NS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRD1.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.81%, smaller than the maximum 0NS.DE drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRD1.DE and 0NS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRD1.DE0NS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.81%

-28.49%

+10.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.70%

-2.47%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.60%

-6.83%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.39%

-21.23%

+15.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-23.55%

+15.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

1.40%

+0.02%

Volatility

TRD1.DE vs. 0NS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD Dist (TRD1.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.12% compared to Amundi US Treasury Bond 0-1Y UCITS ETF SGD Hedged (Acc) (0NS.DE) at 0.98%. This indicates that TRD1.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0NS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRD1.DE0NS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

0.98%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.63%

3.34%

+1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.21%

4.52%

+1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.48%

14.41%

-6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.09%

14.41%

-6.32%

TRD1.DE vs. 0NS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRD1.DE has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than 0NS.DE's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRD1.DE vs. 0NS.DE - Dividend Comparison

TRD1.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, while 0NS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
0NS.DE
Amundi US Treasury Bond 0-1Y UCITS ETF SGD Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRD1.DE
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD Dist
3.86%4.35%4.82%4.70%1.55%0.10%0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRD1.DE and 0NS.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRD1.DE is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRD1.DE is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for 0NS.DE.

TRD1.DE tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index, while 0NS.DE tracks Bloomberg US Short Treasury Index (SGD Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TRD1.DE and 0.08% for 0NS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRD1.DE and 0NS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer