PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRCSX vs. VTMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRCSX vs. VTMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund (TRCSX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund Admiral Shares (VTMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRCSX achieves a 19.49% return, which is significantly lower than VTMSX's 21.93% return.


TRCSX

1D
1.38%
1M
-1.62%
6M
13.37%
YTD
19.49%
1Y
34.86%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.41%

VTMSX

1D
0.86%
1M
-0.56%
6M
15.49%
YTD
21.93%
1Y
36.13%
3Y*
13.30%
5Y*
7.52%
10Y*
10.75%
ALL TIME*
10.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TRCSX vs. VTMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TRCSX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund
19.49%12.72%11.36%16.97%-20.47%4.05%
VTMSX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund Admiral Shares
21.93%5.93%8.61%15.95%-16.16%9.39%

Correlation

The correlation between TRCSX and VTMSX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2021

0.92

The correlation between TRCSX and VTMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRCSX vs. VTMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRCSX
TRCSX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
TRCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
TRCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VTMSX
VTMSX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VTMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRCSX vs. VTMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund (TRCSX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund Admiral Shares (VTMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRCSXVTMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

3.79

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.86

12.88

-1.02

TRCSX vs. VTMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the VTMSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRCSX and VTMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRCSX vs. VTMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRCSX drawdown since its inception was -31.94%, smaller than the maximum VTMSX drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRCSX and VTMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRCSXVTMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.94%

-57.84%

+25.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.96%

-8.59%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.82%

-27.93%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.94%

-27.93%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

-1.82%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.12%

-8.88%

-4.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.53%

+0.53%

Volatility

TRCSX vs. VTMSX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund (TRCSX) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund Admiral Shares (VTMSX) at 3.47%. This indicates that TRCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRCSXVTMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

3.47%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.19%

11.67%

+2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.69%

17.40%

+2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.12%

21.32%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.94%

23.07%

-0.13%

TRCSX vs. VTMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRCSX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMSX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRCSX vs. VTMSX - Dividend Comparison

TRCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than VTMSX's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TRCSX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund
2.00%2.39%3.18%1.27%1.58%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTMSX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund Admiral Shares
1.19%1.28%1.44%1.50%1.51%1.16%1.09%1.15%1.26%1.11%1.01%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRCSX and VTMSX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRCSX has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to VTMSX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRCSX dropped -31.94% vs VTMSX's -57.84%.

TRCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRCSX and VTMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer