TRCSX vs. SSLCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TRCSX (T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund) and SSLCX (DWS Small Cap Core Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TRCSX returned 6.54%/yr vs 6.36%/yr for SSLCX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRCSX charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SSLCX.

Performance

TRCSX vs. SSLCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund (TRCSX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRCSX achieves a 18.68% return, which is significantly higher than SSLCX's 12.74% return.

TRCSX

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 4.98%
• YTD: 18.68%
• 6M: 17.42%
• 1Y: 41.07%
• 3Y*: 18.53%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: —

SSLCX

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 6M: 12.70%
• 1Y: 18.16%
• 3Y*: 13.71%
• 5Y*: 6.36%
• 10Y*: 10.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRCSX vs. SSLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TRCSX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund	18.68%	12.72%	11.36%	16.97%	-20.47%	4.05%
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund	12.74%	4.99%	9.85%	13.09%	-13.53%	13.22%

Correlation

The correlation between TRCSX and SSLCX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2021	0.87

The correlation between TRCSX and SSLCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TRCSX vs. SSLCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRCSX

TRCSX Risk / Return Rank: 75
TRCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
TRCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
TRCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
TRCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
TRCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

SSLCX

SSLCX Risk / Return Rank: 24
SSLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
SSLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
SSLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
SSLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
SSLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRCSX vs. SSLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund (TRCSX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRCSX	SSLCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	1.30	+1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	1.87	+1.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.23	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.58	2.12	+2.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.85	6.69	+9.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRCSX vs. SSLCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRCSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the SSLCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRCSX and SSLCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRCSX	SSLCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	1.30	+1.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.37	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.39	-0.05

Drawdowns

TRCSX vs. SSLCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRCSX drawdown since its inception was -31.94%, smaller than the maximum SSLCX drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRCSX and SSLCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRCSX	SSLCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.94%	-63.14%	+31.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.96%	-8.78%	-2.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.82%	-17.34%	-10.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.94%	-22.57%	-9.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-48.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	0.00%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.51%	-11.31%	-2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	2.77%	+0.24%

Volatility

TRCSX vs. SSLCX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund (TRCSX) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) at 4.08%. This indicates that TRCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRCSX	SSLCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.66%	4.08%	+1.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.60%	10.00%	+4.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.58%	14.28%	+5.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.15%	17.37%	+5.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.10%	21.05%	+2.05%

TRCSX vs. SSLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRCSX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SSLCX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRCSX vs. SSLCX - Dividend Comparison

TRCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than SSLCX's 1.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund	1.07%	1.21%	1.52%	0.68%	1.07%	1.67%	0.35%	0.16%	5.99%	5.78%	0.60%	8.42%
TRCSX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund	2.02%	2.39%	3.18%	1.27%	1.58%	1.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRCSX and SSLCX in my portfolio?

TRCSX and SSLCX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRCSX or SSLCX?

TRCSX has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to SSLCX (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRCSX dropped -31.94% vs SSLCX's -63.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.