PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRCSX vs. FTMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRCSX vs. FTMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund (TRCSX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund (FTMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRCSX achieves a 20.77% return, which is significantly lower than FTMSX's 31.22% return.


TRCSX

1D
-0.48%
1M
1.26%
6M
13.71%
YTD
20.77%
1Y
33.23%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*

FTMSX

1D
-0.56%
1M
5.11%
6M
23.17%
YTD
31.22%
1Y
40.39%
3Y*
11.99%
5Y*
0.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRCSX vs. FTMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TRCSX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund
20.77%12.72%11.36%16.97%-20.47%4.05%
FTMSX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund
31.22%0.30%3.88%13.11%-31.07%7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TRCSX and FTMSX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2021

0.87

The correlation between TRCSX and FTMSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRCSX vs. FTMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRCSX
TRCSX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TRCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TRCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FTMSX
FTMSX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FTMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FTMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRCSX vs. FTMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund (TRCSX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund (FTMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRCSXFTMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.24

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

2.13

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.88

7.88

+4.00

TRCSX vs. FTMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the FTMSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRCSX and FTMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRCSX vs. FTMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRCSX drawdown since its inception was -31.94%, smaller than the maximum FTMSX drawdown of -53.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRCSX and FTMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRCSXFTMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.94%

-53.12%

+21.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.96%

-17.52%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.82%

-35.01%

+7.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.94%

-48.67%

+16.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-2.55%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.24%

-22.08%

+8.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

4.74%

-1.73%

Volatility

TRCSX vs. FTMSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund (TRCSX) is 4.89%, while Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund (FTMSX) has a volatility of 7.53%. This indicates that TRCSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRCSXFTMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

7.53%

-2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

17.98%

-3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.90%

25.86%

-5.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.20%

28.14%

-4.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

30.47%

-7.45%

TRCSX vs. FTMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRCSX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FTMSX's 2.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRCSX vs. FTMSX - Dividend Comparison

TRCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, while FTMSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FTMSX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%0.12%0.00%0.00%8.27%0.37%4.90%
TRCSX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund
1.98%2.39%3.18%1.27%1.58%1.69%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRCSX and FTMSX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTMSX has higher volatility (7.53%) compared to TRCSX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRCSX dropped -31.94% vs FTMSX's -53.12%.

TRCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRCSX and FTMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer