PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TR7G.L vs. XLKS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TR7G.L vs. XLKS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TR7G.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TR7G.L is traded in GBp, while XLKS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLKS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TR7G.L achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than XLKS.L's 24.03% return.


TR7G.L

1D
0.19%
1M
0.89%
YTD
-0.28%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
1.00%
5Y*
1.44%
10Y*

XLKS.L

1D
-2.32%
1M
14.28%
YTD
24.03%
6M
22.23%
1Y
54.41%
3Y*
33.26%
5Y*
26.61%
10Y*
27.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TR7G.L vs. XLKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TR7G.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist
-0.28%-0.02%3.75%-1.47%1.43%-1.10%3.37%3.42%
XLKS.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
24.03%15.38%44.20%52.61%-20.70%36.00%38.58%42.48%

Correlation

The correlation between TR7G.L and XLKS.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2019

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TR7G.L vs. XLKS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TR7G.L
TR7G.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TR7G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TR7G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TR7G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TR7G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TR7G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XLKS.L
XLKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XLKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TR7G.L vs. XLKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TR7G.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TR7G.LXLKS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.44

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

3.20

-2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.02

8.18

-6.16

TR7G.L vs. XLKS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TR7G.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the XLKS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TR7G.L and XLKS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TR7G.LXLKS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

2.68

-1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

1.16

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

1.10

-0.96

Drawdowns

TR7G.L vs. XLKS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TR7G.L drawdown since its inception was -20.51%, smaller than the maximum XLKS.L drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TR7G.L and XLKS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TR7G.LXLKS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.51%

-28.80%

+8.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.09%

-16.92%

+11.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.34%

-28.80%

+21.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.64%

-28.80%

+13.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.27%

-2.80%

-10.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.82%

-4.71%

-8.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

6.63%

-4.55%

Volatility

TR7G.L vs. XLKS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TR7G.L) is 1.56%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) has a volatility of 7.55%. This indicates that TR7G.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TR7G.LXLKS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

7.55%

-5.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.33%

15.35%

-11.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.90%

20.23%

-14.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.27%

23.02%

-14.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.90%

22.09%

-13.19%

TR7G.L vs. XLKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TR7G.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than XLKS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TR7G.L vs. XLKS.L - Dividend Comparison

TR7G.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, while XLKS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
TR7G.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist
4.12%4.11%4.14%3.67%1.71%0.85%1.38%1.94%
XLKS.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TR7G.L and XLKS.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TR7G.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TR7G.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLKS.L.

TR7G.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while XLKS.L is Technology Equities. TR7G.L tracks Bloomberg US 3-7 Year Treasury Bond Index, while XLKS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TR7G.L and 0.14% for XLKS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TR7G.L and XLKS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer