PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TR7G.L vs. MDBU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TR7G.L vs. MDBU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TR7G.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (MDBU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TR7G.L achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than MDBU.L's 0.13% return.


TR7G.L

1D
0.19%
1M
0.89%
YTD
-0.28%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
1.00%
5Y*
1.44%
10Y*

MDBU.L

1D
0.17%
1M
0.98%
YTD
0.13%
6M
-0.22%
1Y
4.43%
3Y*
1.21%
5Y*
2.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TR7G.L vs. MDBU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TR7G.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist
-0.28%-0.02%3.75%-1.47%1.43%-1.10%3.37%3.42%
MDBU.L
UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.13%-0.80%4.66%-1.28%3.51%-0.35%1.30%1.13%

Correlation

The correlation between TR7G.L and MDBU.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2019

0.87

The correlation between TR7G.L and MDBU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TR7G.L vs. MDBU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TR7G.L
TR7G.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TR7G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TR7G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TR7G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TR7G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TR7G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

MDBU.L
MDBU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MDBU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDBU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDBU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
MDBU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDBU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TR7G.L vs. MDBU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TR7G.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (MDBU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TR7G.LMDBU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.13

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

0.94

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.02

2.30

-0.28

TR7G.L vs. MDBU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TR7G.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the MDBU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TR7G.L and MDBU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TR7G.LMDBU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

0.73

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.24

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.13

+0.01

Drawdowns

TR7G.L vs. MDBU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TR7G.L drawdown since its inception was -20.51%, which is greater than MDBU.L's maximum drawdown of -18.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TR7G.L and MDBU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TR7G.LMDBU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.51%

-18.04%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.09%

-4.76%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.34%

-7.99%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.64%

-16.15%

+0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.27%

-9.05%

-4.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.82%

-10.90%

-1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.93%

+0.15%

Volatility

TR7G.L vs. MDBU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TR7G.L) is 1.56%, while UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (MDBU.L) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that TR7G.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDBU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TR7G.LMDBU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

1.66%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.33%

4.44%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.90%

6.06%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.27%

8.41%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.90%

9.23%

-0.33%

TR7G.L vs. MDBU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TR7G.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than MDBU.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TR7G.L vs. MDBU.L - Dividend Comparison

TR7G.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than MDBU.L's 3.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
MDBU.L
UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
3.14%3.96%2.14%1.92%0.75%0.74%1.73%1.66%
TR7G.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist
4.12%4.11%4.14%3.67%1.71%0.85%1.38%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TR7G.L and MDBU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TR7G.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TR7G.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for MDBU.L.

TR7G.L tracks Bloomberg US 3-7 Year Treasury Bond Index, while MDBU.L tracks Solactive Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TR7G.L and 0.18% for MDBU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TR7G.L and MDBU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer