TR3G.L vs. FTWG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TR3G.L (Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist) and FTWG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - TR3G.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index, while FTWG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TR3G.L returned 4.42% vs 30.16% for FTWG.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TR3G.L charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FTWG.L.

Performance

TR3G.L vs. FTWG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TR3G.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TR3G.L achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly lower than FTWG.L's 11.87% return.

TR3G.L

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: 0.69%
• 6M: 0.31%
• 1Y: 4.42%
• 3Y*: 1.51%
• 5Y*: 2.93%
• 10Y*: —

FTWG.L

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 11.87%
• 6M: 12.43%
• 1Y: 30.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TR3G.L vs. FTWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TR3G.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist	0.69%	-1.98%	5.82%	2.15%
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist	11.87%	14.12%	19.92%	7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between TR3G.L and FTWG.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.04

Return for Risk

TR3G.L vs. FTWG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TR3G.L

TR3G.L Risk / Return Rank: 21
TR3G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
TR3G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
TR3G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 20
TR3G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
TR3G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 21

FTWG.L

FTWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
FTWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FTWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FTWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FTWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FTWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TR3G.L vs. FTWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TR3G.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TR3G.L	FTWG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	2.92	-2.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	4.01	-2.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.56	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	4.23	-3.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.48	17.22	-14.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TR3G.L vs. FTWG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TR3G.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the FTWG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TR3G.L and FTWG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TR3G.L	FTWG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73	2.92	-2.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	1.55	-1.36

Drawdowns

TR3G.L vs. FTWG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TR3G.L drawdown since its inception was -18.79%, which is greater than FTWG.L's maximum drawdown of -17.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TR3G.L and FTWG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	TR3G.L	FTWG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.79%	-17.78%	-1.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.52%	-7.11%	+2.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.63%	-0.42%	-7.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.79%	-1.99%	-7.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	1.75%	+0.03%

Volatility

TR3G.L vs. FTWG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TR3G.L) is 1.70%, while Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that TR3G.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TR3G.L	FTWG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.70%	3.04%	-1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.44%	7.59%	-3.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.07%	10.28%	-4.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.07%	11.89%	-3.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.64%	11.89%	-3.25%

TR3G.L vs. FTWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TR3G.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FTWG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TR3G.L vs. FTWG.L - Dividend Comparison

TR3G.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than FTWG.L's 1.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist	1.22%	1.34%	1.50%	0.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TR3G.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist	3.95%	4.10%	4.31%	4.18%	1.99%	0.31%	1.28%	2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TR3G.L and FTWG.L in my portfolio?

TR3G.L and FTWG.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TR3G.L or FTWG.L?

On fees, TR3G.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TR3G.L or FTWG.L?

TR3G.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FTWG.L.

What is the main difference between TR3G.L and FTWG.L?

TR3G.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while FTWG.L is Global Equities. TR3G.L tracks Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index, while FTWG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TR3G.L and 0.15% for FTWG.L.