PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQVIX vs. FSWCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQVIX vs. FSWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Value Equity Fund (TQVIX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQVIX achieves a 15.49% return, which is significantly higher than FSWCX's 14.13% return.


TQVIX

1D
0.60%
1M
3.07%
YTD
15.49%
6M
14.64%
1Y
29.01%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
12.40%
10Y*
12.26%

FSWCX

1D
0.46%
1M
1.45%
YTD
14.13%
6M
13.62%
1Y
33.16%
3Y*
23.44%
5Y*
14.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQVIX vs. FSWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TQVIX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Value Equity Fund
15.49%14.88%16.20%11.79%-3.29%29.07%-0.23%25.53%-10.80%-0.22%
FSWCX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
14.13%22.50%19.90%12.64%-3.50%30.43%-4.44%29.09%-11.54%0.77%

Correlation

The correlation between TQVIX and FSWCX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017

0.95

The correlation between TQVIX and FSWCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQVIX vs. FSWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQVIX
TQVIX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
TQVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
TQVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FSWCX
FSWCX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FSWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FSWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQVIX vs. FSWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Value Equity Fund (TQVIX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TQVIXFSWCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.54

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.15

5.90

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.77

20.07

-2.31

TQVIX vs. FSWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQVIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the FSWCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQVIX and FSWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TQVIX vs. FSWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQVIX drawdown since its inception was -40.69%, roughly equal to the maximum FSWCX drawdown of -41.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQVIX and FSWCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQVIXFSWCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.69%

-41.41%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

-5.77%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.60%

-16.13%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.59%

-19.62%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.79%

+1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-5.55%

+0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.69%

0.00%

Volatility

TQVIX vs. FSWCX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Value Equity Fund (TQVIX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX) have volatilities of 3.97% and 4.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQVIXFSWCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

4.14%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.77%

8.21%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.22%

11.53%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.98%

16.72%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

20.75%

-2.28%

TQVIX vs. FSWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQVIX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FSWCX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQVIX vs. FSWCX - Dividend Comparison

TQVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, less than FSWCX's 6.48% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FSWCX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
6.48%7.40%8.86%9.68%12.90%5.71%2.55%2.37%3.84%0.07%0.00%
TQVIX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Value Equity Fund
4.21%4.87%8.44%7.46%6.32%2.68%2.26%3.75%5.76%1.92%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


TQVIX and FSWCX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSWCX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to TQVIX (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQVIX dropped -40.69% vs FSWCX's -41.41%.

FSWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQVIX and FSWCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer