PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQSMX vs. VSCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQSMX vs. VSCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (TQSMX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TQSMX having a 14.91% return and VSCPX slightly lower at 14.17%. Over the past 10 years, TQSMX has outperformed VSCPX with an annualized return of 12.59%, while VSCPX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.31% annualized return.


TQSMX

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.90%
YTD
14.91%
6M
14.48%
1Y
30.54%
3Y*
20.07%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
12.59%

VSCPX

1D
-0.68%
1M
2.34%
YTD
14.17%
6M
13.55%
1Y
28.92%
3Y*
17.06%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
11.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQSMX vs. VSCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TQSMX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund
14.91%12.75%16.34%21.72%-13.07%21.85%11.68%30.19%-10.91%15.44%
VSCPX
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
14.17%8.86%12.98%19.52%-17.59%17.75%19.09%27.40%-9.31%16.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TQSMX and VSCPX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2016

0.98

The correlation between TQSMX and VSCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQSMX vs. VSCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQSMX
TQSMX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TQSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TQSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

VSCPX
VSCPX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VSCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
VSCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQSMX vs. VSCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (TQSMX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TQSMXVSCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.31

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.23

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.72

11.91

-0.19

TQSMX vs. VSCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the VSCPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQSMX and VSCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TQSMXVSCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.78

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.35

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.53

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.54

+0.13

Drawdowns

TQSMX vs. VSCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQSMX drawdown since its inception was -40.66%, roughly equal to the maximum VSCPX drawdown of -41.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQSMX and VSCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQSMXVSCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.66%

-41.81%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-8.97%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.82%

-25.25%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.82%

-28.13%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.66%

-41.81%

+1.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.68%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.17%

-6.49%

+1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.42%

+0.16%

Volatility

TQSMX vs. VSCPX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (TQSMX) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSCPX) at 4.44%. This indicates that TQSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQSMXVSCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

4.44%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.56%

11.72%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.31%

16.29%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.53%

20.71%

-1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.34%

21.57%

-1.23%

TQSMX vs. VSCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQSMX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than VSCPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQSMX vs. VSCPX - Dividend Comparison

TQSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than VSCPX's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQSMX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund
1.00%1.15%6.48%3.39%6.06%1.40%0.81%1.18%2.12%0.35%0.00%0.00%
VSCPX
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
1.21%1.35%1.32%1.56%1.56%1.26%1.16%1.41%1.69%1.37%1.52%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, TQSMX and VSCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TQSMX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to VSCPX (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQSMX dropped -40.66% vs VSCPX's -41.81%.

TQSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQSMX and VSCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer