PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQSMX vs. TNVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQSMX vs. TNVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (TQSMX) and 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (TNVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TQSMX having a 14.91% return and TNVIX slightly higher at 15.52%. Over the past 10 years, TQSMX has outperformed TNVIX with an annualized return of 12.59%, while TNVIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.43% annualized return.


TQSMX

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.90%
YTD
14.91%
6M
14.48%
1Y
30.54%
3Y*
20.07%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
12.59%

TNVIX

1D
-0.78%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
15.52%
6M
16.78%
1Y
35.08%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
11.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQSMX vs. TNVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TQSMX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund
14.91%12.75%16.34%21.72%-13.07%21.85%11.68%30.19%-10.91%15.44%
TNVIX
1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund
15.52%13.91%11.48%21.31%-11.37%21.85%11.33%19.81%-14.34%19.00%

Correlation

The correlation between TQSMX and TNVIX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2016

0.90

The correlation between TQSMX and TNVIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQSMX vs. TNVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQSMX
TQSMX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TQSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TQSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

TNVIX
TNVIX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TNVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
TNVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQSMX vs. TNVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (TQSMX) and 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (TNVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TQSMXTNVIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.40

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.72

12.00

-0.28

TQSMX vs. TNVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the TNVIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQSMX and TNVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TQSMXTNVIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.07

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.46

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.54

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.49

+0.18

Drawdowns

TQSMX vs. TNVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQSMX drawdown since its inception was -40.66%, roughly equal to the maximum TNVIX drawdown of -42.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQSMX and TNVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQSMXTNVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.66%

-42.75%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-10.14%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.82%

-20.59%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.82%

-25.61%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.66%

-42.75%

+2.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-1.95%

+1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.17%

-6.21%

+1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.87%

-0.29%

Volatility

TQSMX vs. TNVIX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (TQSMX) and 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (TNVIX) have volatilities of 5.07% and 5.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQSMXTNVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

5.05%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.56%

12.18%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.31%

16.76%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.53%

19.80%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.34%

21.14%

-0.80%

TQSMX vs. TNVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQSMX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than TNVIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQSMX vs. TNVIX - Dividend Comparison

TQSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than TNVIX's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TNVIX
1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund
3.42%3.95%8.76%3.82%2.51%7.05%0.47%1.74%1.58%1.87%1.79%
TQSMX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund
1.00%1.15%6.48%3.39%6.06%1.40%0.81%1.18%2.12%0.35%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TQSMX and TNVIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQSMX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to TNVIX (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQSMX dropped -40.66% vs TNVIX's -42.75%.

TNVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQSMX and TNVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer