PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQSM.TO vs. TGRO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQSM.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Q U.S. Small-Mid-Cap Equity ETF (TQSM.TO) and TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQSM.TO achieves a 13.30% return, which is significantly higher than TGRO.TO's 9.93% return.


TQSM.TO

1D
0.18%
1M
4.65%
YTD
13.30%
6M
11.31%
1Y
22.10%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
13.10%
10Y*

TGRO.TO

1D
-0.38%
1M
5.22%
YTD
9.93%
6M
9.81%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
13.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQSM.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TQSM.TO
TD Q U.S. Small-Mid-Cap Equity ETF
13.30%1.20%20.45%18.86%0.22%25.08%7.23%
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
9.93%18.03%22.28%18.36%-11.39%20.46%2,565.79%

Correlation

The correlation between TQSM.TO and TGRO.TO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2020

0.60

The correlation between TQSM.TO and TGRO.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQSM.TO vs. TGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQSM.TO
TQSM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TQSM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQSM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQSM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
TQSM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQSM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

TGRO.TO
TGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQSM.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Q U.S. Small-Mid-Cap Equity ETF (TQSM.TO) and TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TQSM.TOTGRO.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.49

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

3.56

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

15.71

-7.21

TQSM.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQSM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQSM.TO and TGRO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TQSM.TOTGRO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.58

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

1.14

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.10

+0.52

Drawdowns

TQSM.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQSM.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, which is greater than TGRO.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQSM.TO and TGRO.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQSM.TOTGRO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.03%

-18.37%

-14.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-7.21%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.78%

-13.27%

-10.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.78%

-18.37%

-5.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.41%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-3.46%

-2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

1.63%

+0.98%

Volatility

TQSM.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison

TD Q U.S. Small-Mid-Cap Equity ETF (TQSM.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) at 3.28%. This indicates that TQSM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQSM.TOTGRO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

3.28%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

8.10%

+2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.04%

9.93%

+5.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

11.69%

+4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.17%

995.08%

-976.91%

TQSM.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQSM.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TGRO.TO's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQSM.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison

TQSM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than TGRO.TO's 1.78% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
1.78%2.03%2.04%2.17%2.46%1.58%0.83%
TQSM.TO
TD Q U.S. Small-Mid-Cap Equity ETF
0.78%0.90%0.89%0.85%1.34%0.78%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


TQSM.TO and TGRO.TO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TQSM.TO.

TQSM.TO is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while TGRO.TO is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TQSM.TO and 0.15% for TGRO.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQSM.TO and TGRO.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer