PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQGM.TO vs. MINT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQGM.TO vs. MINT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Q Global Multifactor ETF (TQGM.TO) and Manulife Multifactor Developed International Index ETF (MINT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQGM.TO achieves a 14.87% return, which is significantly higher than MINT.TO's 11.34% return.


TQGM.TO

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.08%
6M
10.95%
YTD
14.87%
1Y
27.71%
3Y*
21.85%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*

MINT.TO

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.05%
6M
7.53%
YTD
11.34%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQGM.TO vs. MINT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TQGM.TO
TD Q Global Multifactor ETF
14.87%20.97%25.26%8.13%-4.74%12.19%0.64%0.00%
MINT.TO
Manulife Multifactor Developed International Index ETF
11.34%23.42%10.91%18.04%-3.59%17.69%0.55%1.77%

Correlation

The correlation between TQGM.TO and MINT.TO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2019

0.33

Over the past year, TQGM.TO and MINT.TO have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQGM.TO vs. MINT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQGM.TO
TQGM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TQGM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQGM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQGM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
TQGM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQGM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

MINT.TO
MINT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MINT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MINT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQGM.TO vs. MINT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Q Global Multifactor ETF (TQGM.TO) and Manulife Multifactor Developed International Index ETF (MINT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TQGM.TOMINT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.37

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

2.74

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.23

10.51

+6.73

TQGM.TO vs. MINT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQGM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the MINT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQGM.TO and MINT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TQGM.TO vs. MINT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQGM.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.34%, smaller than the maximum MINT.TO drawdown of -32.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQGM.TO and MINT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQGM.TOMINT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.34%

-32.97%

+8.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-9.11%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.38%

-13.76%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.62%

-18.04%

+3.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-1.34%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-4.17%

+0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

2.37%

-0.76%

Volatility

TQGM.TO vs. MINT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TD Q Global Multifactor ETF (TQGM.TO) is 2.31%, while Manulife Multifactor Developed International Index ETF (MINT.TO) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that TQGM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MINT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQGM.TOMINT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

3.95%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.67%

11.53%

-2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.03%

13.39%

-2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.85%

14.66%

-3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.38%

16.63%

-4.25%

Dividends

TQGM.TO vs. MINT.TO - Dividend Comparison

TQGM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than MINT.TO's 2.86% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MINT.TO
Manulife Multifactor Developed International Index ETF
2.86%5.86%2.14%2.81%2.84%2.55%1.60%2.70%2.76%1.36%
TQGM.TO
TD Q Global Multifactor ETF
1.19%1.36%2.18%2.67%2.82%2.40%2.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TQGM.TO and MINT.TO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQGM.TO is categorized as Multi-factor, while MINT.TO is International Equity. They also come from different issuers: TD and Manulife.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQGM.TO and MINT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer