PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQGD.TO vs. TQGM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQGD.TO vs. TQGM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Q Global Dividend ETF (TQGD.TO) and TD Q Global Multifactor ETF (TQGM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TQGD.TO having a 13.16% return and TQGM.TO slightly higher at 13.62%.


TQGD.TO

1D
-0.39%
1M
8.13%
YTD
13.16%
6M
12.52%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
14.85%
10Y*

TQGM.TO

1D
0.21%
1M
7.11%
YTD
13.62%
6M
12.79%
1Y
28.61%
3Y*
21.42%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQGD.TO vs. TQGM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TQGD.TO
TD Q Global Dividend ETF
13.16%16.45%17.65%15.06%1.03%21.14%-5.84%0.62%
TQGM.TO
TD Q Global Multifactor ETF
13.62%20.97%25.26%8.13%-4.74%12.19%0.64%-0.87%

Correlation

The correlation between TQGD.TO and TQGM.TO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2019

0.47

Over the past year, TQGD.TO and TQGM.TO have become more correlated (0.77) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.

TQGD.TO vs. TQGM.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TQGD.TO
TQGM.TO

Technology

28.1%
20.3%

Financial Services

17.1%
12.8%

Industrials

9.6%
16.1%

Communication Services

9.1%
12.4%

Healthcare

8.9%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%
13.8%

Energy

5.1%
7.0%

Real Estate

4.4%
0.1%

Utilities

3.3%
1.1%

Basic Materials

1.4%
2.4%

Technology

TQGD.TO
28.1%
TQGM.TO
20.3%

Financial Services

TQGD.TO
17.1%
TQGM.TO
12.8%

Industrials

TQGD.TO
9.6%
TQGM.TO
16.1%

Communication Services

TQGD.TO
9.1%
TQGM.TO
12.4%

Healthcare

TQGD.TO
8.9%
TQGM.TO
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

TQGD.TO
7.1%
TQGM.TO
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

TQGD.TO
5.9%
TQGM.TO
13.8%

Energy

TQGD.TO
5.1%
TQGM.TO
7.0%

Real Estate

TQGD.TO
4.4%
TQGM.TO
0.1%

Utilities

TQGD.TO
3.3%
TQGM.TO
1.1%

Basic Materials

TQGD.TO
1.4%
TQGM.TO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQGD.TO vs. TQGM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQGD.TO
TQGD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TQGD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQGD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQGD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TQGD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQGD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

TQGM.TO
TQGM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TQGM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQGM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQGM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TQGM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQGM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQGD.TO vs. TQGM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Q Global Dividend ETF (TQGD.TO) and TD Q Global Multifactor ETF (TQGM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TQGD.TOTQGM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.50

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.76

4.37

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.55

17.98

+0.57

TQGD.TO vs. TQGM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQGD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the TQGM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQGD.TO and TQGM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TQGD.TOTQGM.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

2.70

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.24

1.29

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.91

-0.10

Drawdowns

TQGD.TO vs. TQGM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQGD.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.22%, which is greater than TQGM.TO's maximum drawdown of -24.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQGD.TO and TQGM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQGD.TOTQGM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.22%

-24.34%

-5.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.05%

-6.57%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.52%

-10.38%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.52%

-14.62%

-0.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

0.00%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-3.47%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.60%

-0.05%

Volatility

TQGD.TO vs. TQGM.TO - Volatility Comparison

TD Q Global Dividend ETF (TQGD.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to TD Q Global Multifactor ETF (TQGM.TO) at 2.90%. This indicates that TQGD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQGM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQGD.TOTQGM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

2.90%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.74%

8.28%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.44%

10.67%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.08%

10.77%

+1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.68%

12.40%

+2.28%

TQGD.TO vs. TQGM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQGD.TO has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than TQGM.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQGD.TO vs. TQGM.TO - Dividend Comparison

TQGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than TQGM.TO's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
TQGD.TO
TD Q Global Dividend ETF
2.69%2.89%3.38%3.65%3.89%3.40%4.85%0.36%
TQGM.TO
TD Q Global Multifactor ETF
1.20%1.36%2.18%2.67%2.82%2.40%2.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TQGD.TO and TQGM.TO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TQGD.TO is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TQGD.TO is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for TQGM.TO.

TQGD.TO is categorized as Global Equity Income, while TQGM.TO is Multi-factor. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TQGD.TO and 0.45% for TQGM.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQGD.TO and TQGM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer