PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQCD.TO vs. ZCN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQCD.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Q Canadian Dividend ETF (TQCD.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQCD.TO achieves a 14.98% return, which is significantly higher than ZCN.TO's 10.70% return.


TQCD.TO

1D
-0.42%
1M
3.98%
YTD
14.98%
6M
17.36%
1Y
37.82%
3Y*
26.50%
5Y*
17.84%
10Y*

ZCN.TO

1D
-1.14%
1M
3.62%
YTD
10.70%
6M
12.95%
1Y
34.77%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
14.90%
10Y*
12.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQCD.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TQCD.TO
TD Q Canadian Dividend ETF
14.98%33.11%22.27%12.29%1.68%26.29%-13.24%3.12%
ZCN.TO
BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
10.70%31.51%21.64%11.63%-5.84%25.05%5.69%0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between TQCD.TO and ZCN.TO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2019

0.82

The correlation between TQCD.TO and ZCN.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

TQCD.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TQCD.TO
ZCN.TO

Financial Services

35.4%
32.8%

Energy

21.1%
17.5%

Basic Materials

15.1%
18.4%

Industrials

10.2%
10.3%

Utilities

5.1%
3.2%

Real Estate

3.8%
1.6%

Communication Services

3.4%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
2.9%

Technology

1.1%
7.6%

Healthcare

0.3%
0.1%

Financial Services

TQCD.TO
35.4%
ZCN.TO
32.8%

Energy

TQCD.TO
21.1%
ZCN.TO
17.5%

Basic Materials

TQCD.TO
15.1%
ZCN.TO
18.4%

Industrials

TQCD.TO
10.2%
ZCN.TO
10.3%

Utilities

TQCD.TO
5.1%
ZCN.TO
3.2%

Real Estate

TQCD.TO
3.8%
ZCN.TO
1.6%

Communication Services

TQCD.TO
3.4%
ZCN.TO
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TQCD.TO
2.6%
ZCN.TO
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

TQCD.TO
2.0%
ZCN.TO
2.9%

Technology

TQCD.TO
1.1%
ZCN.TO
7.6%

Healthcare

TQCD.TO
0.3%
ZCN.TO
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQCD.TO vs. ZCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQCD.TO
TQCD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
TQCD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQCD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQCD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
TQCD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQCD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

ZCN.TO
ZCN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ZCN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQCD.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Q Canadian Dividend ETF (TQCD.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TQCD.TOZCN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.50

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.22

3.75

+1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.92

17.48

+8.44

TQCD.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQCD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.83, which is higher than the ZCN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQCD.TO and ZCN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TQCD.TOZCN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83

2.76

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.46

1.15

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.68

+0.07

Drawdowns

TQCD.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQCD.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.47%, which is greater than ZCN.TO's maximum drawdown of -37.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQCD.TO and ZCN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQCD.TOZCN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.47%

-37.18%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.27%

-9.30%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.42%

-12.25%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.65%

-16.25%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-1.14%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-4.76%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

1.99%

-0.53%

Volatility

TQCD.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TD Q Canadian Dividend ETF (TQCD.TO) is 2.86%, while BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that TQCD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZCN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQCD.TOZCN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

3.49%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.99%

10.31%

-2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.92%

12.66%

-2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.33%

13.09%

-0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.43%

14.99%

+4.44%

TQCD.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQCD.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ZCN.TO's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQCD.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Dividend Comparison

TQCD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than ZCN.TO's 2.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQCD.TO
TD Q Canadian Dividend ETF
2.77%2.95%3.47%3.73%4.03%4.09%6.20%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZCN.TO
BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
2.03%2.22%2.78%3.29%3.27%2.74%3.24%3.13%3.16%2.71%2.84%3.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


TQCD.TO and ZCN.TO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZCN.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for TQCD.TO.

They also come from different issuers: TD and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for TQCD.TO and 0.06% for ZCN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQCD.TO and ZCN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer