TQCAX vs. NEIMX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Touchstone Dividend Equity Fund (TQCAX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX).

TQCAX is managed by Touchstone. It was launched on Jun 7, 1998. NEIMX is managed by Neiman Funds. It was launched on Apr 1, 2003.

Performance

TQCAX vs. NEIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Dividend Equity Fund (TQCAX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TQCAX vs. NEIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TQCAX Touchstone Dividend Equity Fund	0.36%	16.36%	12.60%	10.89%	-5.76%	8.12%
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund	5.61%	18.68%	13.50%	6.15%	-5.16%	10.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQCAX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than NEIMX's 5.61% return.

TQCAX

• 1D: 1.97%
• 1M: -5.04%
• YTD: 0.36%
• 6M: 2.74%
• 1Y: 15.49%
• 3Y*: 13.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NEIMX

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -3.83%
• YTD: 5.61%
• 6M: 8.69%
• 1Y: 25.83%
• 3Y*: 14.76%
• 5Y*: 10.37%
• 10Y*: 9.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQCAX vs. NEIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQCAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than NEIMX's 1.46% expense ratio.

NEIMX

Neiman Large Cap Value Fund

TQCAX

Touchstone Dividend Equity Fund

Return for Risk

TQCAX vs. NEIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQCAX

TQCAX Risk / Return Rank: 43
TQCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
TQCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
TQCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
TQCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
TQCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

NEIMX

NEIMX Risk / Return Rank: 87
NEIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
NEIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
NEIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
NEIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
NEIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQCAX vs. NEIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Dividend Equity Fund (TQCAX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TQCAX	NEIMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	1.65	-0.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	2.32	-0.90
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.38	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	2.49	-1.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.92	12.55	-6.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TQCAX vs. NEIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQCAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the NEIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQCAX and NEIMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TQCAX	NEIMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96	1.65	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.03	+0.57

Correlation

The correlation between TQCAX and NEIMX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

TQCAX vs. NEIMX - Dividend Comparison

TQCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, more than NEIMX's 0.72% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TQCAX Touchstone Dividend Equity Fund	6.44%	6.40%	7.16%	4.69%	5.30%	2.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund	0.72%	0.76%	1.10%	1.36%	3.60%	17.65%	1.20%	2.26%	1.20%	6.64%	10.20%	4.19%

Drawdowns

TQCAX vs. NEIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQCAX drawdown since its inception was -18.84%, smaller than the maximum NEIMX drawdown of -92.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQCAX and NEIMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TQCAX	NEIMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.84%	-92.94%	+74.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.02%	-10.78%	-1.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-92.94%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-92.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.54%	-90.08%	+84.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.83%	-9.92%	+6.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	2.14%	+0.62%

Volatility

TQCAX vs. NEIMX - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone Dividend Equity Fund (TQCAX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) have volatilities of 3.88% and 4.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TQCAX	NEIMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	4.05%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.81%	8.52%	-0.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.93%	15.65%	+0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.86%	576.30%	-561.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.86%	407.62%	-392.76%