PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQAIX vs. DSCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQAIX vs. DSCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund Class I (TQAIX) and Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQAIX achieves a 20.73% return, which is significantly lower than DSCIX's 27.35% return. Over the past 10 years, TQAIX has outperformed DSCIX with an annualized return of 12.85%, while DSCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.70% annualized return.


TQAIX

1D
1.60%
1M
7.09%
YTD
20.73%
6M
17.71%
1Y
34.63%
3Y*
18.47%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
12.85%

DSCIX

1D
0.59%
1M
7.00%
YTD
27.35%
6M
24.76%
1Y
49.12%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
10.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQAIX vs. DSCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TQAIX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund Class I
20.73%10.28%13.10%21.34%-22.38%11.32%24.01%32.92%-6.77%22.26%
DSCIX
Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund
27.35%13.18%5.10%20.00%-21.46%30.92%13.33%21.51%-16.96%11.59%

Correlation

The correlation between TQAIX and DSCIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2016

0.94

The correlation between TQAIX and DSCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQAIX vs. DSCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQAIX
TQAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TQAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TQAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

DSCIX
DSCIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DSCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DSCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQAIX vs. DSCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund Class I (TQAIX) and Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TQAIXDSCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.49

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

7.23

-4.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.53

26.04

-14.51

TQAIX vs. DSCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the DSCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQAIX and DSCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TQAIX vs. DSCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQAIX drawdown since its inception was -37.58%, smaller than the maximum DSCIX drawdown of -47.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQAIX and DSCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQAIXDSCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.58%

-47.60%

+10.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.07%

-7.08%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.78%

-32.94%

+7.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.12%

-32.94%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.58%

-47.60%

+10.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

-9.82%

+2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

1.96%

+1.17%

Volatility

TQAIX vs. DSCIX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund Class I (TQAIX) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX) at 4.51%. This indicates that TQAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DSCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQAIXDSCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

4.51%

+2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.76%

12.30%

+3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.84%

17.39%

+2.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.52%

22.20%

-0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

23.26%

-1.67%

TQAIX vs. DSCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQAIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DSCIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQAIX vs. DSCIX - Dividend Comparison

TQAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, more than DSCIX's 4.68% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DSCIX
Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund
4.68%6.01%0.16%0.30%4.99%8.71%0.05%0.00%9.11%0.03%0.18%
TQAIX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund Class I
5.20%6.27%8.01%2.41%3.70%13.89%3.01%4.11%4.68%0.21%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, TQAIX and DSCIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TQAIX has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to DSCIX (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQAIX dropped -37.58% vs DSCIX's -47.60%.

DSCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQAIX and DSCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer