PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPXG.L vs. LGJG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPXG.L vs. LGJG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TPXG.L having a 14.95% return and LGJG.L slightly lower at 14.69%.


TPXG.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
5.60%
YTD
14.95%
6M
14.59%
1Y
32.01%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
10.97%
10Y*

LGJG.L

1D
-0.18%
1M
6.18%
YTD
14.69%
6M
14.39%
1Y
31.74%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPXG.L vs. LGJG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TPXG.L
Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY
14.95%18.33%8.12%13.45%-6.05%2.07%7.12%8.68%
LGJG.L
L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF
14.69%17.46%10.01%13.64%-6.84%1.78%13.24%11.39%

Correlation

The correlation between TPXG.L and LGJG.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2019

0.51

Over the past year, TPXG.L and LGJG.L have become more correlated (0.99) than their long-term average of 0.51, meaning their price movements have been converging.

TPXG.L vs. LGJG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TPXG.L
LGJG.L

Financial Services

20.0%
17.4%

Consumer Cyclical

19.2%
12.5%

Healthcare

15.1%
5.7%

Industrials

10.8%
24.2%

Technology

10.7%
19.8%

Communication Services

7.4%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
3.7%

Basic Materials

4.1%
3.8%

Energy

3.7%
0.7%

Utilities

3.0%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.5%
2.7%

Financial Services

TPXG.L
20.0%
LGJG.L
17.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TPXG.L
19.2%
LGJG.L
12.5%

Healthcare

TPXG.L
15.1%
LGJG.L
5.7%

Industrials

TPXG.L
10.8%
LGJG.L
24.2%

Technology

TPXG.L
10.7%
LGJG.L
19.8%

Communication Services

TPXG.L
7.4%
LGJG.L
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

TPXG.L
4.7%
LGJG.L
3.7%

Basic Materials

TPXG.L
4.1%
LGJG.L
3.8%

Energy

TPXG.L
3.7%
LGJG.L
0.7%

Utilities

TPXG.L
3.0%
LGJG.L
1.0%

Real Estate

TPXG.L
1.5%
LGJG.L
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPXG.L vs. LGJG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPXG.L
TPXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TPXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
TPXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

LGJG.L
LGJG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LGJG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGJG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGJG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
LGJG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGJG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPXG.L vs. LGJG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPXG.LLGJG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

2.86

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.66

9.27

+0.40

TPXG.L vs. LGJG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPXG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the LGJG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPXG.L and LGJG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPXG.LLGJG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.79

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.65

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.64

+0.23

Drawdowns

TPXG.L vs. LGJG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPXG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.96%, roughly equal to the maximum LGJG.L drawdown of -22.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPXG.L and LGJG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPXG.LLGJG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.96%

-22.92%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.57%

-11.04%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.96%

-13.84%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.00%

-18.20%

+0.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.18%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-5.15%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

3.42%

-0.12%

Volatility

TPXG.L vs. LGJG.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L) have volatilities of 3.74% and 3.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPXG.LLGJG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

3.71%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.16%

14.24%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.29%

17.63%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.10%

15.58%

+4.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.48%

16.81%

+7.67%

TPXG.L vs. LGJG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPXG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LGJG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TPXG.L vs. LGJG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither TPXG.L nor LGJG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, TPXG.L and LGJG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LGJG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGJG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TPXG.L.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TPXG.L and 0.10% for LGJG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPXG.L and LGJG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer