TPXG.L vs. IJPA.L
TPXG.L (Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY) and IJPA.L (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Japan Equities funds - TPXG.L tracks the TOPIX TR JPY while IJPA.L tracks the MSCI Japan Investable Market Index (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TPXG.L returned 10.97%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for IJPA.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TPXG.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for IJPA.L.
Performance
TPXG.L vs. IJPA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TPXG.L is traded in GBp, while IJPA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IJPA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPXG.L achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly lower than IJPA.L's 16.15% return.
TPXG.L
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 5.60%
- YTD
- 14.95%
- 6M
- 14.59%
- 1Y
- 32.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.91%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- —
IJPA.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 6.14%
- YTD
- 16.15%
- 6M
- 15.80%
- 1Y
- 33.76%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
TPXG.L vs. IJPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPXG.L Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY | 14.95% | 18.33% | 8.12% | 13.45% | -6.05% | 2.07% | 7.12% | 8.68% | -2.90% | 7.54% |
IJPA.L iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc | 16.15% | 18.21% | 8.48% | 13.38% | -6.19% | 1.11% | 11.60% | 13.95% | -9.06% | 7.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPXG.L and IJPA.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, TPXG.L and IJPA.L have become more correlated (0.95) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.
TPXG.L vs. IJPA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TPXG.L
IJPA.L
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
TPXG.L
IJPA.L
Consumer Cyclical
TPXG.L
IJPA.L
Healthcare
TPXG.L
IJPA.L
Industrials
TPXG.L
IJPA.L
Technology
TPXG.L
IJPA.L
Communication Services
TPXG.L
IJPA.L
Consumer Defensive
TPXG.L
IJPA.L
Basic Materials
TPXG.L
IJPA.L
Energy
TPXG.L
IJPA.L
Utilities
TPXG.L
IJPA.L
Real Estate
TPXG.L
IJPA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPXG.L vs. IJPA.L — Risk / Return Rank
TPXG.L
IJPA.L
TPXG.L vs. IJPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPXG.L | IJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 3.16 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.66 | 10.36 | -0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPXG.L | IJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 1.81 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.62 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.54 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
TPXG.L vs. IJPA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPXG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.96%, smaller than the maximum IJPA.L drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPXG.L and IJPA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPXG.L | IJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.96% | -25.10% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.57% | -10.63% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.96% | -13.21% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.00% | -18.93% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.05% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -6.35% | +1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 3.25% | +0.05% |
Volatility
TPXG.L vs. IJPA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L) is 3.74%, while iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that TPXG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPXG.L | IJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 4.11% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.16% | 15.54% | -1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.29% | 18.61% | -1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 16.16% | +3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 16.58% | +7.90% |
TPXG.L vs. IJPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPXG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IJPA.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TPXG.L vs. IJPA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither TPXG.L nor IJPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, TPXG.L and IJPA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IJPA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TPXG.L.
TPXG.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while IJPA.L tracks MSCI Japan Investable Market Index (IMI). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TPXG.L and 0.12% for IJPA.L.
Find the right allocation for TPXG.L and IJPA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer