TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO
TPU.TO (TD U.S. Equity Index ETF) and HXS.TO (Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPU.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index, while HXS.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TPU.TO returned 16.10%/yr vs 15.90%/yr for HXS.TO. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TPU.TO charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for HXS.TO.
Performance
TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TPU.TO having a 12.48% return and HXS.TO slightly lower at 11.99%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TPU.TO having a 16.10% annualized return and HXS.TO not far behind at 15.90%.
TPU.TO
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 12.48%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 29.73%
- 3Y*
- 23.84%
- 5Y*
- 16.57%
- 10Y*
- 16.10%
HXS.TO
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 10.17%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 23.29%
- 5Y*
- 16.64%
- 10Y*
- 15.90%
TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPU.TO TD U.S. Equity Index ETF | 12.48% | 12.69% | 34.82% | 24.24% | -14.31% | 26.02% | 18.73% | 25.02% | 3.03% | 13.31% |
HXS.TO Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF | 11.99% | 11.93% | 34.98% | 23.22% | -12.72% | 27.30% | 15.78% | 24.69% | 3.03% | 13.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPU.TO and HXS.TO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2016 | 0.91 |
The correlation between TPU.TO and HXS.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TPU.TO
HXS.TO
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
TPU.TO
HXS.TO
Communication Services
TPU.TO
HXS.TO
Financial Services
TPU.TO
HXS.TO
Consumer Cyclical
TPU.TO
HXS.TO
Healthcare
TPU.TO
HXS.TO
Industrials
TPU.TO
HXS.TO
Consumer Defensive
TPU.TO
HXS.TO
Energy
TPU.TO
HXS.TO
Utilities
TPU.TO
HXS.TO
Basic Materials
TPU.TO
HXS.TO
Real Estate
TPU.TO
HXS.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TPU.TO
HXS.TO
TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD U.S. Equity Index ETF (TPU.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPU.TO | HXS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.45 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 3.33 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.86 | 12.62 | +0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPU.TO | HXS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 2.46 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 1.11 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | 0.97 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 1.02 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPU.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.96%, roughly equal to the maximum HXS.TO drawdown of -27.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPU.TO and HXS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPU.TO | HXS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.96% | -27.42% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -8.74% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -18.98% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.73% | -22.63% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.96% | -27.42% | -0.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -0.27% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -3.54% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.30% | +0.02% |
Volatility
TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Volatility Comparison
TD U.S. Equity Index ETF (TPU.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) have volatilities of 3.23% and 3.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPU.TO | HXS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.23% | 3.27% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.83% | 8.83% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 11.85% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.31% | 15.13% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.60% | 16.53% | +0.07% |
TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPU.TO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than HXS.TO's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Dividend Comparison
TPU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while HXS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXS.TO Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPU.TO TD U.S. Equity Index ETF | 0.85% | 0.96% | 0.90% | 1.22% | 1.34% | 0.99% | 1.23% | 1.23% | 1.57% | 1.59% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, TPU.TO and HXS.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, TPU.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TPU.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for HXS.TO.
TPU.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HXS.TO is S&P 500. TPU.TO tracks Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index, while HXS.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: TD and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TPU.TO and 0.10% for HXS.TO.
Find the right allocation for TPU.TO and HXS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer