PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD U.S. Equity Index ETF (TPU.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TPU.TO having a 12.48% return and HXS.TO slightly lower at 11.99%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TPU.TO having a 16.10% annualized return and HXS.TO not far behind at 15.90%.


TPU.TO

1D
-0.27%
1M
7.38%
YTD
12.48%
6M
10.60%
1Y
29.73%
3Y*
23.84%
5Y*
16.57%
10Y*
16.10%

HXS.TO

1D
-0.27%
1M
7.20%
YTD
11.99%
6M
10.17%
1Y
29.00%
3Y*
23.29%
5Y*
16.64%
10Y*
15.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPU.TO
TD U.S. Equity Index ETF
12.48%12.69%34.82%24.24%-14.31%26.02%18.73%25.02%3.03%13.31%
HXS.TO
Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF
11.99%11.93%34.98%23.22%-12.72%27.30%15.78%24.69%3.03%13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TPU.TO and HXS.TO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2016

0.91

The correlation between TPU.TO and HXS.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TPU.TO
HXS.TO

Technology

35.3%
35.6%

Communication Services

11.5%
11.2%

Financial Services

11.5%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.8%
8.5%

Industrials

8.6%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.9%

Energy

3.6%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.9%

Technology

TPU.TO
35.3%
HXS.TO
35.6%

Communication Services

TPU.TO
11.5%
HXS.TO
11.2%

Financial Services

TPU.TO
11.5%
HXS.TO
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TPU.TO
10.0%
HXS.TO
10.1%

Healthcare

TPU.TO
8.8%
HXS.TO
8.5%

Industrials

TPU.TO
8.6%
HXS.TO
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

TPU.TO
4.8%
HXS.TO
4.9%

Energy

TPU.TO
3.6%
HXS.TO
3.5%

Utilities

TPU.TO
2.3%
HXS.TO
2.4%

Basic Materials

TPU.TO
1.8%
HXS.TO
1.8%

Real Estate

TPU.TO
1.8%
HXS.TO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPU.TO
TPU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TPU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
TPU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

HXS.TO
HXS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD U.S. Equity Index ETF (TPU.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPU.TOHXS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

3.33

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.86

12.62

+0.24

TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPU.TO and HXS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPU.TOHXS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.46

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

1.11

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

0.97

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

1.02

-0.04

Drawdowns

TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPU.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.96%, roughly equal to the maximum HXS.TO drawdown of -27.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPU.TO and HXS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPU.TOHXS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.96%

-27.42%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-8.74%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-18.98%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.73%

-22.63%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.96%

-27.42%

-0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.27%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-3.54%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.30%

+0.02%

Volatility

TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Volatility Comparison

TD U.S. Equity Index ETF (TPU.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) have volatilities of 3.23% and 3.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPU.TOHXS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

3.27%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

8.83%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

11.85%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.31%

15.13%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

16.53%

+0.07%

TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPU.TO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than HXS.TO's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TPU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Dividend Comparison

TPU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while HXS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HXS.TO
Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPU.TO
TD U.S. Equity Index ETF
0.85%0.96%0.90%1.22%1.34%0.99%1.23%1.23%1.57%1.59%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, TPU.TO and HXS.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TPU.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TPU.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for HXS.TO.

TPU.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HXS.TO is S&P 500. TPU.TO tracks Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index, while HXS.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: TD and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TPU.TO and 0.10% for HXS.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPU.TO and HXS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer