TPHD vs. IWS
TPHD (Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF) and IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - TPHD tracks the Victory US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Weighted BRI Index while IWS tracks the Russell Midcap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TPHD returned 8.52%/yr vs 8.37%/yr for IWS. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TPHD charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWS.
Performance
TPHD vs. IWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPHD achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than IWS's 15.06% return.
TPHD
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 13.23%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- —
IWS
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- 15.06%
- 6M
- 15.13%
- 1Y
- 27.01%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
TPHD vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPHD Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF | 8.56% | 8.28% | 12.14% | 8.86% | -1.91% | 27.98% | -1.30% | 10.35% |
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 15.06% | 10.82% | 12.91% | 12.52% | -12.29% | 28.10% | 4.83% | 8.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPHD and IWS is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2019 | 0.91 |
The correlation between TPHD and IWS shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TPHD vs. IWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TPHD
IWS
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
TPHD
IWS
Industrials
TPHD
IWS
Energy
TPHD
IWS
Financial Services
TPHD
IWS
Consumer Cyclical
TPHD
IWS
Technology
TPHD
IWS
Basic Materials
TPHD
IWS
Consumer Defensive
TPHD
IWS
Healthcare
TPHD
IWS
Communication Services
TPHD
IWS
Real Estate
TPHD
IWS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPHD vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank
TPHD
IWS
TPHD vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF (TPHD) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPHD | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 3.60 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.20 | 13.59 | -7.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPHD | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 2.06 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.49 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.42 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
TPHD vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPHD drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, smaller than the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPHD and IWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPHD | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -62.40% | +20.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -7.53% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.89% | -20.57% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.54% | -21.23% | +4.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.25% | -0.04% | -3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -8.02% | +3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 1.99% | +0.15% |
Volatility
TPHD vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF (TPHD) is 2.60%, while iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that TPHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPHD | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 3.40% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.35% | 9.57% | -2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.48% | 13.19% | -2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.60% | 17.30% | -2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.63% | 19.36% | +0.27% |
TPHD vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPHD has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPHD vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison
TPHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than IWS's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.50% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 1.39% | 1.87% | 1.97% | 2.53% | 1.96% | 2.10% | 2.14% |
TPHD Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF | 2.00% | 2.10% | 2.09% | 2.19% | 2.38% | 1.86% | 2.38% | 1.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPHD and IWS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWS has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to TPHD (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPHD dropped -41.71% vs IWS's -62.40%.
On 5-year performance, TPHD leads with 8.52% vs 8.37% for IWS. On fees, IWS is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, TPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TPHD has performed better with a 8.52% return vs 8.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWS is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TPHD.
TPHD has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.34% for IWS.
TPHD tracks Victory US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TPHD and 0.23% for IWS.
IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPHD and IWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer