PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPAY vs. OMAH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPAY vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF (TPAY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TPAY

1D
-0.57%
1M
5.18%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OMAH

1D
-0.70%
1M
0.44%
YTD
4.56%
6M
4.00%
1Y
11.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPAY vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TPAY and OMAH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPAY vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPAY

OMAH
OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPAY vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF (TPAY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TPAY vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPAYOMAHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.80

0.70

+2.10

Drawdowns

TPAY vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPAY drawdown since its inception was -8.62%, smaller than the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPAY and OMAH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPAYOMAHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.62%

-11.83%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-2.65%

+2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.82%

-1.26%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

Volatility

TPAY vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPAYOMAHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.17%

8.05%

+6.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.17%

13.21%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.17%

13.21%

+0.96%

TPAY vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPAY has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPAY vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

TPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than OMAH's 15.44% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TPAY and OMAH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TPAY is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TPAY is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 2.32% for TPAY.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TPAY and 0.95% for OMAH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPAY and OMAH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer