PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPAY vs. LQTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPAY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF (TPAY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TPAY

1D
0.39%
1M
4.73%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LQTI

1D
0.47%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.63%
6M
0.68%
1Y
5.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPAY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TPAY and LQTI is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026

0.53

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPAY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPAY

LQTI
LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPAY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF (TPAY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TPAY vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPAYLQTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.91

0.94

+1.96

Drawdowns

TPAY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPAY drawdown since its inception was -8.62%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPAY and LQTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPAYLQTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.62%

-3.41%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.97%

+0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.80%

-0.88%

-0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

Volatility

TPAY vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPAYLQTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.08%

5.12%

+8.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.08%

5.97%

+8.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.08%

5.97%

+8.11%

TPAY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPAY has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPAY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

TPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than LQTI's 9.07% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TPAY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TPAY is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TPAY is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LQTI.

LQTI has the higher dividend yield at 9.07%, compared with 2.31% for TPAY.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TPAY and 0.65% for LQTI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPAY and LQTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer