PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPAY vs. ARMW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPAY vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF (TPAY) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TPAY

1D
-0.57%
1M
5.18%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMW

1D
3.44%
1M
128.75%
YTD
363.23%
6M
245.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPAY vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TPAY and ARMW is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPAY vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF (TPAY) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TPAY vs. ARMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPAYARMWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.80

4.96

-2.16

Drawdowns

TPAY vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPAY drawdown since its inception was -8.62%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPAY and ARMW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPAYARMWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.62%

-48.47%

+39.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

0.00%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.82%

-26.55%

+24.73%

Volatility

TPAY vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPAYARMWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.17%

88.46%

-74.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.17%

88.46%

-74.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.17%

88.46%

-74.29%

TPAY vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPAY has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPAY vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

TPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than ARMW's 15.20% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TPAY and ARMW have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TPAY is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TPAY is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 15.20%, compared with 2.32% for TPAY.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TPAY and 0.99% for ARMW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPAY and ARMW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer